2010•AIP conference proceedingsRequires access

Similarities and Differences between Spatial Coherence Profilometry and White-light Interferometry

Pavel Pavlíček, Mitsuo Takeda, Pramod K. Rastogi, Erwin Hack

Abstract

Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Reprints and Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Pavel Pavliček, Mitsuo Takeda; Similarities and Differences between Spatial Coherence Profilometry and White‐light Interferometry. AIP Conf. Proc. 15 April 2010; 1236 (1): 161–166. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3426104 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAIP Publishing PortfolioAIP Conference Proceedings Search Advanced Search |Citation Search

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Key concepts: White light interferometry, Profilometer, Interferometry, Optics, Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy), White light, Spatial coherence, White (mutation)