2002•Journal of Engineering EducationOpen access

Use of Student Management Teams (SMTs) as a Course Evaluation Tool

Neeraj Buch

Open full text 6 citations

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of a management team is to provide continuous feedback to the instructor on two major issues: instructor performance and course structure and content. Successful student management team projects at the University of Wisconsin, University of Colorado and University of Minnesota have demonstrated that team members working together for the good of the class can accomplish a great deal. In the Michigan State University pilot project, the student management teams operated during a 15‐week course on construction materials. This is a 4‐credit required junior level course for all Civil Engineering majors and has both a classroom and a laboratory component. The average class size is thirty‐five students. The team met every week for about thirty to forty‐five minutes over the course of the semester. Their principal assignment was to improve the quality of the course by collecting data through classroom assessment techniques and regular group discussions with the instructor. It was clear from the formative surveys that 85% and 88% of the students were comfortable (level of understanding between 4–5) with the material “uncovered” in the Portland cement concrete (PCC) and hot mix asphalt concrete (HMAC) modules respectively. This paper discusses the concept of management teams along with other details in developing the management teams and results from the pilot study.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The purpose of a management team is to provide continuous feedback to the instructor on two major issues: instructor performance and course structure and content. Successful student management team projects at the University of Wisconsin, University of Colorado and University of Minnesota have demonstrated that team members working together for the good of the class can accomplish a great deal. In the Michigan State University pilot project, the student management teams operated during a 15‐week course on construction materials. This is a 4‐credit required junior level course for all Civil Engineering majors and has both a classroom and a laboratory component. The average class size is thirty‐five students. The team met every week for about thirty to forty‐five minutes over the course of the semester. Their principal assignment was to improve the quality of the course by collecting data through classroom assessment techniques and regular group discussions with the instructor. It was clear from the formative surveys that 85% and 88% of the students were comfortable (level of understanding between 4–5) with the material “uncovered” in the Portland cement concrete (PCC) and hot mix asphalt concrete (HMAC) modules respectively. This paper discusses the concept of management teams along with other details in developing the management teams and results from the pilot study.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The purpose of a management team is to provide continuous feedback to the instructor on two major issues: instructor performance and course structure and content. Successful student management team projects at the University of Wisconsin, University of Colorado and University of Minnesota have demonstrated that team members working together for the good of the class can accomplish a great deal. In the Michigan State University pilot project, the student management teams operated during a 15‐week course on construction materials. This is a 4‐credit required junior level course for all Civil Engineering majors and has both a classroom and a laboratory component. The average class size is thirty‐five students. The team met every week for about thirty to forty‐five minutes over the course of the semester. Their principal assignment was to improve the quality of the course by collecting data through classroom assessment techniques and regular group discussions with the instructor. It was clear from the formative surveys that 85% and 88% of the students were comfortable (level of understanding between 4–5) with the material “uncovered” in the Portland cement concrete (PCC) and hot mix asphalt concrete (HMAC) modules respectively. This paper discusses the concept of management teams along with other details in developing the management teams and results from the pilot study.

Key concepts: Formative assessment, Class (philosophy), Engineering, Medical education, Principal (computer security), Teamwork, Course (navigation), Engineering management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Use of Student Management Teams (SMTs) as a Course Evaluation Tool — Research Paper | ScholarLens