1991Clinical Oral Implants ResearchRequires access

A removal torque and histomorphometric study of commercially pure niobium and titanium implants in rabbit bone

Carina B. Johansson, Tomas O. Albrektsson

Open publisher page 155 citations

Abstract

Screw-shaped commercially pure (c.p.) niobium and c.p. titanium implants were inserted in rabbit bone. After a healing period of 3 months, a significantly higher removal torque was demonstrated to unscrew the niobium implants (average 32.9 Ncm) compared to the c.p. titanium implants (average 25.3 Ncm). In the histomorphometric part of the study, there were no significant differences in bone-to-metal contact between the 2 implant materials. An average of 41.1% bony contact was demonstrated for the niobium screws compared to an average of 37.2% for the c.p. titanium ones. Our removal torque findings could be related to the differences that we observed between the 2 implant surfaces as indicated by SEM. Since niobium implants showed a more irregular surface topography and niobium is a softer metal than c.p. titanium, this seems the most probable reason for the differences observed in removal torque between the 2 metals. Hypothetically, a more "positive biocompatibility" of the c.p. niobium in comparison to the c.p. titanium remains as another possible reason for the observed differences. However, against such a difference in biocompatibility between c.p. niobium and c.p. titanium, there is the very similar amount of bony contact registered in the histomorphometric analysis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Screw-shaped commercially pure (c.p.) niobium and c.p. titanium implants were inserted in rabbit bone. After a healing period of 3 months, a significantly higher removal torque was demonstrated to unscrew the niobium implants (average 32.9 Ncm) compared to the c.p. titanium implants (average 25.3 Ncm). In the histomorphometric part of the study, there were no significant differences in bone-to-metal contact between the 2 implant materials. An average of 41.1% bony contact was demonstrated for the niobium screws compared to an average of 37.2% for the c.p. titanium ones. Our removal torque findings could be related to the differences that we observed between the 2 implant surfaces as indicated by SEM. Since niobium implants showed a more irregular surface topography and niobium is a softer metal than c.p. titanium, this seems the most probable reason for the differences observed in removal torque between the 2 metals. Hypothetically, a more "positive biocompatibility" of the c.p. niobium in comparison to the c.p. titanium remains as another possible reason for the observed differences. However, against such a difference in biocompatibility between c.p. niobium and c.p. titanium, there is the very similar amount of bony contact registered in the histomorphometric analysis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 155 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Screw-shaped commercially pure (c.p.) niobium and c.p. titanium implants were inserted in rabbit bone. After a healing period of 3 months, a significantly higher removal torque was demonstrated to unscrew the niobium implants (average 32.9 Ncm) compared to the c.p. titanium implants (average 25.3 Ncm). In the histomorphometric part of the study, there were no significant differences in bone-to-metal contact between the 2 implant materials. An average of 41.1% bony contact was demonstrated for the niobium screws compared to an average of 37.2% for the c.p. titanium ones. Our removal torque findings could be related to the differences that we observed between the 2 implant surfaces as indicated by SEM. Since niobium implants showed a more irregular surface topography and niobium is a softer metal than c.p. titanium, this seems the most probable reason for the differences observed in removal torque between the 2 metals. Hypothetically, a more "positive biocompatibility" of the c.p. niobium in comparison to the c.p. titanium remains as another possible reason for the observed differences. However, against such a difference in biocompatibility between c.p. niobium and c.p. titanium, there is the very similar amount of bony contact registered in the histomorphometric analysis.

Key concepts: Niobium, Titanium, Implant, Materials science, Rabbit (cipher), Dentistry, Biocompatibility, Metal

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A removal torque and histomorphometric study of commercially pure niobium and titanium implants in rabbit bone — Research Paper | ScholarLens