2007Annals of Clinical PsychiatryRequires access

Are There Any Differences in the Efficacy among Second Generation Antipsychotics in the Treatment of Schizophrenia and Related Disorders?

Lucie Bankovská Motlová, Filip Španiel, Cyril Höschl, Richard Balon

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The goal of this review is to summarize the results of head to head efficacy studies that compare second generation antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia and related disorders. METHODS: A literature search through the Medline database and Google was conducted. Articles published up to September 2005 were included. Abstracts from conference papers and posters were not included. RESULTS: Randomized controlled trial data on possible differences in efficacy among atypical antipsychotics are limited. Moreover, the comparison is difficult, as studies differ in outcome measures. The results indicate that first-line second-generation antipsychotics (amisulpride, aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, ziprasidone and zotepine) show comparable efficacy. CONCLUSION: Possible new studies should focus on long-term effects, including cost-effectiveness, quality of life, social functioning and service utilization.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: The goal of this review is to summarize the results of head to head efficacy studies that compare second generation antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia and related disorders. METHODS: A literature search through the Medline database and Google was conducted. Articles published up to September 2005 were included. Abstracts from conference papers and posters were not included. RESULTS: Randomized controlled trial data on possible differences in efficacy among atypical antipsychotics are limited. Moreover, the comparison is difficult, as studies differ in outcome measures. The results indicate that first-line second-generation antipsychotics (amisulpride, aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, ziprasidone and zotepine) show comparable efficacy. CONCLUSION: Possible new studies should focus on long-term effects, including cost-effectiveness, quality of life, social functioning and service utilization.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: The goal of this review is to summarize the results of head to head efficacy studies that compare second generation antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia and related disorders. METHODS: A literature search through the Medline database and Google was conducted. Articles published up to September 2005 were included. Abstracts from conference papers and posters were not included. RESULTS: Randomized controlled trial data on possible differences in efficacy among atypical antipsychotics are limited. Moreover, the comparison is difficult, as studies differ in outcome measures. The results indicate that first-line second-generation antipsychotics (amisulpride, aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, ziprasidone and zotepine) show comparable efficacy. CONCLUSION: Possible new studies should focus on long-term effects, including cost-effectiveness, quality of life, social functioning and service utilization.

Key concepts: Ziprasidone, Amisulpride, Olanzapine, Quetiapine, Aripiprazole, Risperidone, Psychiatry, Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Are There Any Differences in the Efficacy among Second Generation Antipsychotics in the Treatment of Schizophrenia and Related Disorders? — Research Paper | ScholarLens