1996•Nationalism and Ethnic PoliticsRequires access

Culture and politics in Africa: Legitimizing ethnicity, rehabilitating the post‐colonial state

Mordechai Tamarkin

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

This article deals with the interconnections between culture and politics in the context of the ongoing crisis of the post‐colonial African state. It seeks to reassess the role of ethnicity in the debate on the rehabilitation of that state. It starts from the premise that ethnicity, the most effective socio‐political agent in African politics, cannot be suppressed. It argues that ethno‐cultural identity is not inherently inimical to the broad territorial community. The ethnic group is not only a platform from which to pursue exclusive ethnocentric interests and goals; it is also an arena in which a moral debate is engaged concerning the proper relations between individuals and society. The territorial state can become an arena for a debate between diverse ethnic value systems which can result in a bargained, appropriate territorial order. This would confer upon the post‐colonial state the legitimacy it lacks. This can be achieved only if ethnic groups are recognized as legitimate participants in a political‐moral process leading to a broad, territorial consensus. A state premised on a multi‐cultural rather than nation‐building ethos is the appropriate locus for such a process.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article deals with the interconnections between culture and politics in the context of the ongoing crisis of the post‐colonial African state. It seeks to reassess the role of ethnicity in the debate on the rehabilitation of that state. It starts from the premise that ethnicity, the most effective socio‐political agent in African politics, cannot be suppressed. It argues that ethno‐cultural identity is not inherently inimical to the broad territorial community. The ethnic group is not only a platform from which to pursue exclusive ethnocentric interests and goals; it is also an arena in which a moral debate is engaged concerning the proper relations between individuals and society. The territorial state can become an arena for a debate between diverse ethnic value systems which can result in a bargained, appropriate territorial order. This would confer upon the post‐colonial state the legitimacy it lacks. This can be achieved only if ethnic groups are recognized as legitimate participants in a political‐moral process leading to a broad, territorial consensus. A state premised on a multi‐cultural rather than nation‐building ethos is the appropriate locus for such a process.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article deals with the interconnections between culture and politics in the context of the ongoing crisis of the post‐colonial African state. It seeks to reassess the role of ethnicity in the debate on the rehabilitation of that state. It starts from the premise that ethnicity, the most effective socio‐political agent in African politics, cannot be suppressed. It argues that ethno‐cultural identity is not inherently inimical to the broad territorial community. The ethnic group is not only a platform from which to pursue exclusive ethnocentric interests and goals; it is also an arena in which a moral debate is engaged concerning the proper relations between individuals and society. The territorial state can become an arena for a debate between diverse ethnic value systems which can result in a bargained, appropriate territorial order. This would confer upon the post‐colonial state the legitimacy it lacks. This can be achieved only if ethnic groups are recognized as legitimate participants in a political‐moral process leading to a broad, territorial consensus. A state premised on a multi‐cultural rather than nation‐building ethos is the appropriate locus for such a process.

Key concepts: Ethos, Legitimacy, Politics, Ethnic group, Premise, State (computer science), Sociology, Political economy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Culture and politics in Africa: Legitimizing ethnicity, rehabilitating the post‐colonial state — Research Paper | ScholarLens