Culture and politics in Africa: Legitimizing ethnicity, rehabilitating the post‐colonial state
Mordechai Tamarkin
Abstract
Mordechai Tamarkin
Abstract
This article deals with the interconnections between culture and politics in the context of the ongoing crisis of the post‐colonial African state. It seeks to reassess the role of ethnicity in the debate on the rehabilitation of that state. It starts from the premise that ethnicity, the most effective socio‐political agent in African politics, cannot be suppressed. It argues that ethno‐cultural identity is not inherently inimical to the broad territorial community. The ethnic group is not only a platform from which to pursue exclusive ethnocentric interests and goals; it is also an arena in which a moral debate is engaged concerning the proper relations between individuals and society. The territorial state can become an arena for a debate between diverse ethnic value systems which can result in a bargained, appropriate territorial order. This would confer upon the post‐colonial state the legitimacy it lacks. This can be achieved only if ethnic groups are recognized as legitimate participants in a political‐moral process leading to a broad, territorial consensus. A state premised on a multi‐cultural rather than nation‐building ethos is the appropriate locus for such a process.
OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This article deals with the interconnections between culture and politics in the context of the ongoing crisis of the post‐colonial African state. It seeks to reassess the role of ethnicity in the debate on the rehabilitation of that state. It starts from the premise that ethnicity, the most effective socio‐political agent in African politics, cannot be suppressed. It argues that ethno‐cultural identity is not inherently inimical to the broad territorial community. The ethnic group is not only a platform from which to pursue exclusive ethnocentric interests and goals; it is also an arena in which a moral debate is engaged concerning the proper relations between individuals and society. The territorial state can become an arena for a debate between diverse ethnic value systems which can result in a bargained, appropriate territorial order. This would confer upon the post‐colonial state the legitimacy it lacks. This can be achieved only if ethnic groups are recognized as legitimate participants in a political‐moral process leading to a broad, territorial consensus. A state premised on a multi‐cultural rather than nation‐building ethos is the appropriate locus for such a process.
Key concepts: Ethos, Legitimacy, Politics, Ethnic group, Premise, State (computer science), Sociology, Political economy