INTERACTIONS BETWEEN LIGHT AND CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS IN PLANT PHOTOPERIODISM*,†
T. Hoshizaki, K. C. Hamner
Abstract
T. Hoshizaki, K. C. Hamner
Abstract
Abstract— The timing mechanism in plant photoperiodism seems to involve two endogenous circadian rhythms: a light‐on (dawn) rhythm and a light‐off (dusk) rhythm. Following a period of darkness light may affect flowering without affecting the rhythms, or it may affect flowering by rephasing the rhythms. A hypothesis is presented concerning the mechanism of the interaction between illumination and endogenous rhythms based upon correlations between leaf movements and flowering responses in various photoperiodic treatments. The possible role played by phytochrome in the response is considered in relation to the effects of light quality on the responses.
OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract— The timing mechanism in plant photoperiodism seems to involve two endogenous circadian rhythms: a light‐on (dawn) rhythm and a light‐off (dusk) rhythm. Following a period of darkness light may affect flowering without affecting the rhythms, or it may affect flowering by rephasing the rhythms. A hypothesis is presented concerning the mechanism of the interaction between illumination and endogenous rhythms based upon correlations between leaf movements and flowering responses in various photoperiodic treatments. The possible role played by phytochrome in the response is considered in relation to the effects of light quality on the responses.
Key concepts: photoperiodism, Circadian rhythm, Phytochrome, Rhythm, Darkness, Dusk, Biology, Endogeny