1974Australian Journal of Plant PhysiologyRequires access

Phytochrome Action in the Induction of Plowering in Short-day Plants: Effect of Photoperiod Quality

RW King

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

Seedlings of Phavbitis nil and Chenopodium rubrum flower in response to a single inductive dark period preceded and followed by continuous fluorescent light. However, when a far-red irradiation for 1 h or longer was substituted for fluorescent light, the flowering response to an ensuing dark period could be completely inhibited or enhanced up to threefold depending on when the far-red exposure commenced. Evidence of red/far-red photoreversibility established phytochrome as the photoreceptor controlling these responses. There was no indication of the involvement of photosynthetic pigments. For P. nil prolonged exposure (1.5-6 h) to far-red radiation during the photoperiod could shorten (2-3 h) or lengthen (2 h) the duration of darkness required for flowering. The degree of change depended on whether the far-red radiation was imposed just prior to darkness (shortening) or about 9 h prior to darkness (lengthening). In a similar manner the spectral composition of the photoperiod influenced the timing during darkness for earliest sensitivity to brief (5 min) red light interruptions. The shorter the critical dark period, the earlier in darkness the seedlings became sensitive to red light interruptions of darkness. It is clear that the form of phytochrome during the photoperiod influences the timing of phytochrome- linked processes in darkness. Two explanations discussed are a coupling via rhythmic changes in substrate on which phytochrome acts, and an effect on phytochrome reactions which alters the timing of Pf, disappearance during a subsequent dark period.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Seedlings of Phavbitis nil and Chenopodium rubrum flower in response to a single inductive dark period preceded and followed by continuous fluorescent light. However, when a far-red irradiation for 1 h or longer was substituted for fluorescent light, the flowering response to an ensuing dark period could be completely inhibited or enhanced up to threefold depending on when the far-red exposure commenced. Evidence of red/far-red photoreversibility established phytochrome as the photoreceptor controlling these responses. There was no indication of the involvement of photosynthetic pigments. For P. nil prolonged exposure (1.5-6 h) to far-red radiation during the photoperiod could shorten (2-3 h) or lengthen (2 h) the duration of darkness required for flowering. The degree of change depended on whether the far-red radiation was imposed just prior to darkness (shortening) or about 9 h prior to darkness (lengthening). In a similar manner the spectral composition of the photoperiod influenced the timing during darkness for earliest sensitivity to brief (5 min) red light interruptions. The shorter the critical dark period, the earlier in darkness the seedlings became sensitive to red light interruptions of darkness. It is clear that the form of phytochrome during the photoperiod influences the timing of phytochrome- linked processes in darkness. Two explanations discussed are a coupling via rhythmic changes in substrate on which phytochrome acts, and an effect on phytochrome reactions which alters the timing of Pf, disappearance during a subsequent dark period.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Seedlings of Phavbitis nil and Chenopodium rubrum flower in response to a single inductive dark period preceded and followed by continuous fluorescent light. However, when a far-red irradiation for 1 h or longer was substituted for fluorescent light, the flowering response to an ensuing dark period could be completely inhibited or enhanced up to threefold depending on when the far-red exposure commenced. Evidence of red/far-red photoreversibility established phytochrome as the photoreceptor controlling these responses. There was no indication of the involvement of photosynthetic pigments. For P. nil prolonged exposure (1.5-6 h) to far-red radiation during the photoperiod could shorten (2-3 h) or lengthen (2 h) the duration of darkness required for flowering. The degree of change depended on whether the far-red radiation was imposed just prior to darkness (shortening) or about 9 h prior to darkness (lengthening). In a similar manner the spectral composition of the photoperiod influenced the timing during darkness for earliest sensitivity to brief (5 min) red light interruptions. The shorter the critical dark period, the earlier in darkness the seedlings became sensitive to red light interruptions of darkness. It is clear that the form of phytochrome during the photoperiod influences the timing of phytochrome- linked processes in darkness. Two explanations discussed are a coupling via rhythmic changes in substrate on which phytochrome acts, and an effect on phytochrome reactions which alters the timing of Pf, disappearance during a subsequent dark period.

Key concepts: Phytochrome, Darkness, photoperiodism, Biology, Far-red, Botany, Photosynthesis, Red light

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Phytochrome Action in the Induction of Plowering in Short-day Plants: Effect of Photoperiod Quality — Research Paper | ScholarLens