1992British journal of surgeryRequires access

Colonic anastomosis using the biofragmentable anastomotic ring and manual suture: A prospective, randomized study

Risto Gullichsen, T Havia, Jari Ovaska, Arto Rantala

Open publisher page 44 citations

Abstract

One hundred and fifty consecutive patients undergoing colonic surgery were randomized into two groups: 71 underwent hand-suture with a two-layer anastomosis of resorbable suture material (3/0 Dexon) and 79 were fitted with the biofragmentable anastomotic ring (Valtrac-BAR). Five patients, two treated using the BAR and three by suturing, developed anastomotic leakage which required a Hartmann-type reoperation. This was successful in four; one patient in the suture group died after reoperation. One patient who underwent suture had an early anastomotic stricture with fatal sequelae. Three other patients (one in the BAR group and two in the suture group) died after operation from other causes. Thus the mortality rate was 6 per cent in the suture group and 1 per cent in the BAR group. During follow-up, one patient in each group underwent reoperation for anastomotic stricture. Recovery of the gastrointestinal tract was similar in the two groups regarding duration of nasogastric drainage, intravenous fluid therapy and ileus. There was no difference between the groups in duration of hospital stay. The BAR seems to be a safe and reliable alternative to conventional suture anastomosis in colonic surgery.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

One hundred and fifty consecutive patients undergoing colonic surgery were randomized into two groups: 71 underwent hand-suture with a two-layer anastomosis of resorbable suture material (3/0 Dexon) and 79 were fitted with the biofragmentable anastomotic ring (Valtrac-BAR). Five patients, two treated using the BAR and three by suturing, developed anastomotic leakage which required a Hartmann-type reoperation. This was successful in four; one patient in the suture group died after reoperation. One patient who underwent suture had an early anastomotic stricture with fatal sequelae. Three other patients (one in the BAR group and two in the suture group) died after operation from other causes. Thus the mortality rate was 6 per cent in the suture group and 1 per cent in the BAR group. During follow-up, one patient in each group underwent reoperation for anastomotic stricture. Recovery of the gastrointestinal tract was similar in the two groups regarding duration of nasogastric drainage, intravenous fluid therapy and ileus. There was no difference between the groups in duration of hospital stay. The BAR seems to be a safe and reliable alternative to conventional suture anastomosis in colonic surgery.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 44 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

One hundred and fifty consecutive patients undergoing colonic surgery were randomized into two groups: 71 underwent hand-suture with a two-layer anastomosis of resorbable suture material (3/0 Dexon) and 79 were fitted with the biofragmentable anastomotic ring (Valtrac-BAR). Five patients, two treated using the BAR and three by suturing, developed anastomotic leakage which required a Hartmann-type reoperation. This was successful in four; one patient in the suture group died after reoperation. One patient who underwent suture had an early anastomotic stricture with fatal sequelae. Three other patients (one in the BAR group and two in the suture group) died after operation from other causes. Thus the mortality rate was 6 per cent in the suture group and 1 per cent in the BAR group. During follow-up, one patient in each group underwent reoperation for anastomotic stricture. Recovery of the gastrointestinal tract was similar in the two groups regarding duration of nasogastric drainage, intravenous fluid therapy and ileus. There was no difference between the groups in duration of hospital stay. The BAR seems to be a safe and reliable alternative to conventional suture anastomosis in colonic surgery.

Key concepts: Medicine, Anastomosis, Fibrous joint, Surgery, Surgical anastomosis, Randomized controlled trial, Prospective cohort study

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Colonic anastomosis using the biofragmentable anastomotic ring and manual suture: A prospective, randomized study — Research Paper | ScholarLens