Surgical Repair of Esophageal Perforation due to Pneumatic Dilatation for Achalasia
Victor E. Pricolo
Abstract
Victor E. Pricolo
Abstract
Esophageal perforation is a rare complication of pneumatic dilatation for achalasia. The few clinical series reported in the literature recommend, under most circumstances, esophageal repair combined with esophagocardiomyotomy. However, the superiority of this technique over repair alone has never been proven. We reviewed our experience, since 1979, with six operative cases of esophageal perforation from pneumatic dilatation for achalasia. After débridement, the esophagus was repaired and, if possible, buttressed with a gastric fundal patch. There was only one late postoperative death due to sepsis and one upper gastrointestinal bleeding complication in our series. Follow-up (1 to 12 years) revealed no dysphagia in any of the five surviving patients and mild gastroesophageal reflux in two. From a review of the literature we found no reports of similarly treated patients experiencing recurrent symptoms of achalasia. In these acutely ill patients, our operative strategy is more feasible than repair and esophagocardiomyotomy and equally effective.
OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Esophageal perforation is a rare complication of pneumatic dilatation for achalasia. The few clinical series reported in the literature recommend, under most circumstances, esophageal repair combined with esophagocardiomyotomy. However, the superiority of this technique over repair alone has never been proven. We reviewed our experience, since 1979, with six operative cases of esophageal perforation from pneumatic dilatation for achalasia. After débridement, the esophagus was repaired and, if possible, buttressed with a gastric fundal patch. There was only one late postoperative death due to sepsis and one upper gastrointestinal bleeding complication in our series. Follow-up (1 to 12 years) revealed no dysphagia in any of the five surviving patients and mild gastroesophageal reflux in two. From a review of the literature we found no reports of similarly treated patients experiencing recurrent symptoms of achalasia. In these acutely ill patients, our operative strategy is more feasible than repair and esophagocardiomyotomy and equally effective.
Key concepts: Medicine, Achalasia, Dysphagia, Surgery, Perforation, Complication, Esophagus, Sepsis