Detective quantum efficiency of direct flat-panel x-ray imaging detectors for fluoroscopy
Dylan Hunt, Wei Zhao, J. A. Rowlands
Abstract
Dylan Hunt, Wei Zhao, J. A. Rowlands
Abstract
Our goal is to develop a large area, flat panel solid-state detector for fluoroscopy. The detector employs a layer of photoconductor to convert incident x-rays directly to a charge image, which is then read out in real-time using a two dimensional array of thin film transistors (TFTs), or 'active matrix.' In order to guide the design of an optimum fluoroscopic flat-panel detector, a cascaded linear systems model was developed, from which the spatial frequency dependent detective quantum efficiency [DQE(f)] can be obtained. Then DQE(f) was calculated as a function of different detector design parameters, e.g. pixel fill-factor, x-ray exposure, Swank factor, electronic noise, and the calculation was performed for three different x-ray photoconductors: amorphous selenium (a-Se), cadmium zinc telluride (CZT), and lead iodide (PbI2). A critical comparison was made of the advantages and disadvantages of each photoconductor. The results showed that the DQE(0) of all direct detectors has a linear dependence on the pixel fill- factor. For an a-Se layer with an electric field of 10 V/micrometer, DQE(f) is significantly degraded by the electronic noise of the detector, especially at very low x-ray exposure rates (e.g. 0.1 (mu) R/frame). With CZT and PbI2, the detector is more tolerant of electronic noise because of the larger number of charge generated for each absorbed x-ray. We have applied our cascaded linear systems model of the direct, flat-panel detector to fluoroscopy. The theoretical predictions of DQE(f) for different detector parameters, e.g. the type of x-ray photoconductor, fill-factor, and electronic noise, provide a guideline for an optimum detector design for fluoroscopy.
OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Our goal is to develop a large area, flat panel solid-state detector for fluoroscopy. The detector employs a layer of photoconductor to convert incident x-rays directly to a charge image, which is then read out in real-time using a two dimensional array of thin film transistors (TFTs), or 'active matrix.' In order to guide the design of an optimum fluoroscopic flat-panel detector, a cascaded linear systems model was developed, from which the spatial frequency dependent detective quantum efficiency [DQE(f)] can be obtained. Then DQE(f) was calculated as a function of different detector design parameters, e.g. pixel fill-factor, x-ray exposure, Swank factor, electronic noise, and the calculation was performed for three different x-ray photoconductors: amorphous selenium (a-Se), cadmium zinc telluride (CZT), and lead iodide (PbI2). A critical comparison was made of the advantages and disadvantages of each photoconductor. The results showed that the DQE(0) of all direct detectors has a linear dependence on the pixel fill- factor. For an a-Se layer with an electric field of 10 V/micrometer, DQE(f) is significantly degraded by the electronic noise of the detector, especially at very low x-ray exposure rates (e.g. 0.1 (mu) R/frame). With CZT and PbI2, the detector is more tolerant of electronic noise because of the larger number of charge generated for each absorbed x-ray. We have applied our cascaded linear systems model of the direct, flat-panel detector to fluoroscopy. The theoretical predictions of DQE(f) for different detector parameters, e.g. the type of x-ray photoconductor, fill-factor, and electronic noise, provide a guideline for an optimum detector design for fluoroscopy.
Key concepts: Detective quantum efficiency, Detector, Flat panel detector, X-ray detector, Optics, Cadmium zinc telluride, Active matrix, Fluoroscopy