2011Canadian Theatre ReviewRequires access

When the Audience is Ourselves: From Intellectual Argument to Visceral Experience

Jan Selman

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This article reflects on a critical moment within a graduate course on using theatre for transformation. The course married critical readings and discussions on community and change-focused theatre with extensive simulations and other experiential opportunities in leading, creating and experiencing participant-based, activist theatre. One of these events, which engaged students with creating and performing participatory theatre, shook us up and led to some new understandings of how the use of theatre to study theatre can creep up and wallop one, making “education” highly personal, politicized and urgent. This event leads to a discussion of the values of personalizing education and creating “disturbance” as part of educational processes in all theatre classrooms. There are ethical considerations to reflect on, which challenge instructors and students, and possible implications for theatre classrooms that focus on acting and directing are considered.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article reflects on a critical moment within a graduate course on using theatre for transformation. The course married critical readings and discussions on community and change-focused theatre with extensive simulations and other experiential opportunities in leading, creating and experiencing participant-based, activist theatre. One of these events, which engaged students with creating and performing participatory theatre, shook us up and led to some new understandings of how the use of theatre to study theatre can creep up and wallop one, making “education” highly personal, politicized and urgent. This event leads to a discussion of the values of personalizing education and creating “disturbance” as part of educational processes in all theatre classrooms. There are ethical considerations to reflect on, which challenge instructors and students, and possible implications for theatre classrooms that focus on acting and directing are considered.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article reflects on a critical moment within a graduate course on using theatre for transformation. The course married critical readings and discussions on community and change-focused theatre with extensive simulations and other experiential opportunities in leading, creating and experiencing participant-based, activist theatre. One of these events, which engaged students with creating and performing participatory theatre, shook us up and led to some new understandings of how the use of theatre to study theatre can creep up and wallop one, making “education” highly personal, politicized and urgent. This event leads to a discussion of the values of personalizing education and creating “disturbance” as part of educational processes in all theatre classrooms. There are ethical considerations to reflect on, which challenge instructors and students, and possible implications for theatre classrooms that focus on acting and directing are considered.

Key concepts: Citizen journalism, Argument (complex analysis), Experiential learning, Theatre studies, Sociology, Pedagogy, Event (particle physics), Visual arts

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
When the Audience is Ourselves: From Intellectual Argument to Visceral Experience — Research Paper | ScholarLens