1997Australian Veterinary JournalRequires access

Persistent efficacy of abamectin and doramectin against gastrointestinal nematodes of cattle

PF ROLFE, KL DAWSON, MD SOLL, G. Nichols, W. G. Ryan

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the persistent activity of injectable formulations of abamectin and doramectin against gastrointestinal nematodes of cattle. DESIGN: Controlled slaughter study assessing residual efficacy. PROCEDURE: Nematode-free calves were treated with abamectin or doramectin (each at a dose of 200 micrograms/kg) and infections then induced with repeated doses of infective larvae of Trichostrongylus axei, Haemonchus placei, Ostertagia ostertagi and Cooperia species. The duration of challenge ranged from 14 to 28 days. The calves were slaughtered at either 38/39 or 45/46 days after the treatments and nematodes recovered from the gastro-intestinal tract. RESULTS: Significant reductions in numbers of O ostertagi occurred for both abamectin and doramectin treatments (> 93%) relative to counts in untreated calves, when challenge was administered up to 21 days after treatment. For T axei and Cooperia spp significant reductions occurred when the challenge occurred for 14 days after treatment (99%). Although differences from untreated animals were not significant, the results for H placei suggested high efficacy (> 85%) for up to 21 days for doramectin and up to 28 days for abamectin. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference between abamectin and doramectin for any parasite at any challenge point, indicating that there is equivalent persistent activity of doramectin and abamectin against important gastrointestinal nematodes of cattle.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To assess the persistent activity of injectable formulations of abamectin and doramectin against gastrointestinal nematodes of cattle. DESIGN: Controlled slaughter study assessing residual efficacy. PROCEDURE: Nematode-free calves were treated with abamectin or doramectin (each at a dose of 200 micrograms/kg) and infections then induced with repeated doses of infective larvae of Trichostrongylus axei, Haemonchus placei, Ostertagia ostertagi and Cooperia species. The duration of challenge ranged from 14 to 28 days. The calves were slaughtered at either 38/39 or 45/46 days after the treatments and nematodes recovered from the gastro-intestinal tract. RESULTS: Significant reductions in numbers of O ostertagi occurred for both abamectin and doramectin treatments (> 93%) relative to counts in untreated calves, when challenge was administered up to 21 days after treatment. For T axei and Cooperia spp significant reductions occurred when the challenge occurred for 14 days after treatment (99%). Although differences from untreated animals were not significant, the results for H placei suggested high efficacy (> 85%) for up to 21 days for doramectin and up to 28 days for abamectin. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference between abamectin and doramectin for any parasite at any challenge point, indicating that there is equivalent persistent activity of doramectin and abamectin against important gastrointestinal nematodes of cattle.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the persistent activity of injectable formulations of abamectin and doramectin against gastrointestinal nematodes of cattle. DESIGN: Controlled slaughter study assessing residual efficacy. PROCEDURE: Nematode-free calves were treated with abamectin or doramectin (each at a dose of 200 micrograms/kg) and infections then induced with repeated doses of infective larvae of Trichostrongylus axei, Haemonchus placei, Ostertagia ostertagi and Cooperia species. The duration of challenge ranged from 14 to 28 days. The calves were slaughtered at either 38/39 or 45/46 days after the treatments and nematodes recovered from the gastro-intestinal tract. RESULTS: Significant reductions in numbers of O ostertagi occurred for both abamectin and doramectin treatments (> 93%) relative to counts in untreated calves, when challenge was administered up to 21 days after treatment. For T axei and Cooperia spp significant reductions occurred when the challenge occurred for 14 days after treatment (99%). Although differences from untreated animals were not significant, the results for H placei suggested high efficacy (> 85%) for up to 21 days for doramectin and up to 28 days for abamectin. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference between abamectin and doramectin for any parasite at any challenge point, indicating that there is equivalent persistent activity of doramectin and abamectin against important gastrointestinal nematodes of cattle.

Key concepts: Doramectin, Abamectin, Ostertagia ostertagi, Biology, Avermectin, Veterinary medicine, Ostertagia, Animal science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Persistent efficacy of abamectin and doramectin against gastrointestinal nematodes of cattle — Research Paper | ScholarLens