1981Soil Science Society of America JournalRequires access

Effects of Soil Properties, Water Content, and Compactive Effort on the Compaction of Selected California Forest and Range Soils

Richard F. Howard, Michael J. Singer, Gregory A. Frantz

Open publisher page 70 citations

Abstract

Abstract Soil compaction reduces plant growth in a variety of settings. In forest and range sites, amelioration of a compacted soil is usually impractical, therefore, emphasis has been given to minimizing and preventing compaction. To provide information on inherent soil compactibility, important factors related to susceptibility to compaction were identified by multiple linear regression of soil physical and chemical properties on Proctor maximum dry bulk densities. The following equation was derived: D b = 1.91 − 0.0596 C − 0.0076 W l + 0.0019 S + 0.0058 Fe, where D b = maximum dry bulk density in g/cm 3 , C = organic C content, W l = water content at liquid limit, S = total sand, and Fe = dithionite Fe. The equation has an adjusted R 2 of 98.6% and S y,x = 0.0356. With the use of organic C content, Proctor densities, and normalized change in porosity after compaction as criteria, the 14 soils were ranked by relative susceptibility to compaction. The three criteria produced virtually the same groupings of soils, with the four range soils in the study being most compactible. Moisture content and compactive effort, which can be controlled, are important factors influencing soil compaction. To further understand the compaction behavior of these forest and range soils, six representative soils of different textural characteristics were subjected to Proctor compaction, with 30, 50, and 100 blows at three to four moisture contents ranging from field capacity to 15% less than field capacity. Density increased significantly with each increase in compactive effort, and maximum values were reached near the optimum moisture content of the standard compaction treatment. Analysis of moisture characteristic curves for 14 forest and range soils suggests that two range soils would occur in the field at water contents making them susceptible to puddling. About half the soils would remain at near optimum water contents for compaction for a long period of time under field conditions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Soil compaction reduces plant growth in a variety of settings. In forest and range sites, amelioration of a compacted soil is usually impractical, therefore, emphasis has been given to minimizing and preventing compaction. To provide information on inherent soil compactibility, important factors related to susceptibility to compaction were identified by multiple linear regression of soil physical and chemical properties on Proctor maximum dry bulk densities. The following equation was derived: D b = 1.91 − 0.0596 C − 0.0076 W l + 0.0019 S + 0.0058 Fe, where D b = maximum dry bulk density in g/cm 3 , C = organic C content, W l = water content at liquid limit, S = total sand, and Fe = dithionite Fe. The equation has an adjusted R 2 of 98.6% and S y,x = 0.0356. With the use of organic C content, Proctor densities, and normalized change in porosity after compaction as criteria, the 14 soils were ranked by relative susceptibility to compaction. The three criteria produced virtually the same groupings of soils, with the four range soils in the study being most compactible. Moisture content and compactive effort, which can be controlled, are important factors influencing soil compaction. To further understand the compaction behavior of these forest and range soils, six representative soils of different textural characteristics were subjected to Proctor compaction, with 30, 50, and 100 blows at three to four moisture contents ranging from field capacity to 15% less than field capacity. Density increased significantly with each increase in compactive effort, and maximum values were reached near the optimum moisture content of the standard compaction treatment. Analysis of moisture characteristic curves for 14 forest and range soils suggests that two range soils would occur in the field at water contents making them susceptible to puddling. About half the soils would remain at near optimum water contents for compaction for a long period of time under field conditions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 70 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Soil compaction reduces plant growth in a variety of settings. In forest and range sites, amelioration of a compacted soil is usually impractical, therefore, emphasis has been given to minimizing and preventing compaction. To provide information on inherent soil compactibility, important factors related to susceptibility to compaction were identified by multiple linear regression of soil physical and chemical properties on Proctor maximum dry bulk densities. The following equation was derived: D b = 1.91 − 0.0596 C − 0.0076 W l + 0.0019 S + 0.0058 Fe, where D b = maximum dry bulk density in g/cm 3 , C = organic C content, W l = water content at liquid limit, S = total sand, and Fe = dithionite Fe. The equation has an adjusted R 2 of 98.6% and S y,x = 0.0356. With the use of organic C content, Proctor densities, and normalized change in porosity after compaction as criteria, the 14 soils were ranked by relative susceptibility to compaction. The three criteria produced virtually the same groupings of soils, with the four range soils in the study being most compactible. Moisture content and compactive effort, which can be controlled, are important factors influencing soil compaction. To further understand the compaction behavior of these forest and range soils, six representative soils of different textural characteristics were subjected to Proctor compaction, with 30, 50, and 100 blows at three to four moisture contents ranging from field capacity to 15% less than field capacity. Density increased significantly with each increase in compactive effort, and maximum values were reached near the optimum moisture content of the standard compaction treatment. Analysis of moisture characteristic curves for 14 forest and range soils suggests that two range soils would occur in the field at water contents making them susceptible to puddling. About half the soils would remain at near optimum water contents for compaction for a long period of time under field conditions.

Key concepts: Soil water, Compaction, Water content, Bulk density, Proctor compaction test, Atterberg limits, Environmental science, Soil science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effects of Soil Properties, Water Content, and Compactive Effort on the Compaction of Selected California Forest and Range Soils — Research Paper | ScholarLens