1998Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIERequires access

Lithographic performance of recent DUV photoresists

Bob Streefkerk, Koen van Ingen Schenau, Corine Buijk

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Commercially available photoresists from the major photoresist vendors are investigated using a PAS 5500/300 wafer stepper, a 31.1 mm diameter field size high throughput wafer stepper with variable NA capability up to 0.63. The critical dimension (CD) investigated is 0.25 micrometers and lower for dense and isolated lines and 0.25 micrometers for dense contact holes. The photoresist process performance is quantified by measuring exposure-defocus windows for a specific resolution using a CD SEM. Photoresists that are comparable with or better than APEX-E with RTC top coat, which is the current base line process for lines and spaces imaging performance, are Clariant AZ-DX1300 and Shin Etsu SEPR-4103PB50. Most recent photoresists have much improved delay performance when compared to APEX without top coat. Improvement, when an organic BARC is applied, depends on the actual photoresist characteristics. The optimal photoresist found for 0.25 micrometers contact holes is TOK DP015 C. This process operates at optimal conditions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Commercially available photoresists from the major photoresist vendors are investigated using a PAS 5500/300 wafer stepper, a 31.1 mm diameter field size high throughput wafer stepper with variable NA capability up to 0.63. The critical dimension (CD) investigated is 0.25 micrometers and lower for dense and isolated lines and 0.25 micrometers for dense contact holes. The photoresist process performance is quantified by measuring exposure-defocus windows for a specific resolution using a CD SEM. Photoresists that are comparable with or better than APEX-E with RTC top coat, which is the current base line process for lines and spaces imaging performance, are Clariant AZ-DX1300 and Shin Etsu SEPR-4103PB50. Most recent photoresists have much improved delay performance when compared to APEX without top coat. Improvement, when an organic BARC is applied, depends on the actual photoresist characteristics. The optimal photoresist found for 0.25 micrometers contact holes is TOK DP015 C. This process operates at optimal conditions.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Commercially available photoresists from the major photoresist vendors are investigated using a PAS 5500/300 wafer stepper, a 31.1 mm diameter field size high throughput wafer stepper with variable NA capability up to 0.63. The critical dimension (CD) investigated is 0.25 micrometers and lower for dense and isolated lines and 0.25 micrometers for dense contact holes. The photoresist process performance is quantified by measuring exposure-defocus windows for a specific resolution using a CD SEM. Photoresists that are comparable with or better than APEX-E with RTC top coat, which is the current base line process for lines and spaces imaging performance, are Clariant AZ-DX1300 and Shin Etsu SEPR-4103PB50. Most recent photoresists have much improved delay performance when compared to APEX without top coat. Improvement, when an organic BARC is applied, depends on the actual photoresist characteristics. The optimal photoresist found for 0.25 micrometers contact holes is TOK DP015 C. This process operates at optimal conditions.

Key concepts: Photoresist, Stepper, Wafer, Critical dimension, Materials science, Lithography, Resist, Photolithography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Lithographic performance of recent DUV photoresists — Research Paper | ScholarLens