1980Journal of the American Planning AssociationRequires access

NEPA—Where Have We Been and Where are We Going?

Richard A. Liroff

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

This article reflects on experience with NEPA in the 1970s. It focuses on the assumptions underlying the statute and on recent research testing them. NEPA embodied two theories of administrative change: one emphasizing internal reform and the other stressing external oversight. Both were necessary for NEPA's implementation. The history of the Tellico Dam underscores the limits of NEPA and policy analysis in general in influencing federal projects. The 1977 regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality are an attempt to eliminate the worst elements of die NEPA process. The article concludes with some observations on NEPA's future.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article reflects on experience with NEPA in the 1970s. It focuses on the assumptions underlying the statute and on recent research testing them. NEPA embodied two theories of administrative change: one emphasizing internal reform and the other stressing external oversight. Both were necessary for NEPA's implementation. The history of the Tellico Dam underscores the limits of NEPA and policy analysis in general in influencing federal projects. The 1977 regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality are an attempt to eliminate the worst elements of die NEPA process. The article concludes with some observations on NEPA's future.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article reflects on experience with NEPA in the 1970s. It focuses on the assumptions underlying the statute and on recent research testing them. NEPA embodied two theories of administrative change: one emphasizing internal reform and the other stressing external oversight. Both were necessary for NEPA's implementation. The history of the Tellico Dam underscores the limits of NEPA and policy analysis in general in influencing federal projects. The 1977 regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality are an attempt to eliminate the worst elements of die NEPA process. The article concludes with some observations on NEPA's future.

Key concepts: National Environmental Policy Act, Statute, Process (computing), Political science, Environmental impact statement, Public administration, Environmental policy, Environmental planning

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
NEPA—Where Have We Been and Where are We Going? — Research Paper | ScholarLens