1990•Clinical ChemistryRequires access

Blood cholesterol concentration: fingerstick plasma vs venous serum sampling

Philip Greenland, N Bowley, B Meiklejohn, K L Doane, Charles E. Sparks

Open publisher page 41 citations

Abstract

To assess whether venous and fingerstick blood samples yield similar cholesterol concentrations, we obtained both types of samples simultaneously in 108 volunteers participating in a cholesterol screening program. All samples were analyzed by the same enzymatic method in a standardized laboratory, and pairs of simultaneous samples were measured in the same laboratory run. Cholesterol concentrations in fingerstick-derived plasma were consistently higher than in the venous serum (P less than 0.0001), by a positive bias averaging 3.6%. Cholesterol values in fingerstick plasma also were higher than cholesterol results for venous serum placed in a capillary collection tube (average bias +2.4%). The positive bias of fingerstick plasma vs venous serum results appears to be at least partly due to specimen handling, although a true physiological difference between venous and fingerstick cholesterol concentrations is probably also involved. If a positive bias of this magnitude from fingerstick blood sampling is left unadjusted, substantial numbers of people will be labeled "at risk" and referred to physicians when their true values were actually within the acceptable range.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To assess whether venous and fingerstick blood samples yield similar cholesterol concentrations, we obtained both types of samples simultaneously in 108 volunteers participating in a cholesterol screening program. All samples were analyzed by the same enzymatic method in a standardized laboratory, and pairs of simultaneous samples were measured in the same laboratory run. Cholesterol concentrations in fingerstick-derived plasma were consistently higher than in the venous serum (P less than 0.0001), by a positive bias averaging 3.6%. Cholesterol values in fingerstick plasma also were higher than cholesterol results for venous serum placed in a capillary collection tube (average bias +2.4%). The positive bias of fingerstick plasma vs venous serum results appears to be at least partly due to specimen handling, although a true physiological difference between venous and fingerstick cholesterol concentrations is probably also involved. If a positive bias of this magnitude from fingerstick blood sampling is left unadjusted, substantial numbers of people will be labeled "at risk" and referred to physicians when their true values were actually within the acceptable range.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 41 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To assess whether venous and fingerstick blood samples yield similar cholesterol concentrations, we obtained both types of samples simultaneously in 108 volunteers participating in a cholesterol screening program. All samples were analyzed by the same enzymatic method in a standardized laboratory, and pairs of simultaneous samples were measured in the same laboratory run. Cholesterol concentrations in fingerstick-derived plasma were consistently higher than in the venous serum (P less than 0.0001), by a positive bias averaging 3.6%. Cholesterol values in fingerstick plasma also were higher than cholesterol results for venous serum placed in a capillary collection tube (average bias +2.4%). The positive bias of fingerstick plasma vs venous serum results appears to be at least partly due to specimen handling, although a true physiological difference between venous and fingerstick cholesterol concentrations is probably also involved. If a positive bias of this magnitude from fingerstick blood sampling is left unadjusted, substantial numbers of people will be labeled "at risk" and referred to physicians when their true values were actually within the acceptable range.

Key concepts: Fingerstick, Venous blood, Medicine, Cholesterol, Internal medicine, Blood sampling, Endocrinology, Diabetes mellitus

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Blood cholesterol concentration: fingerstick plasma vs venous serum sampling — Research Paper | ScholarLens