2003•The Thai Journal of Veterinary MedicineOpen access

AN INACTIVATED NEWCASTLE DISEASE VACCINE PART II: THE EFFICACY OF AN INACTIVATED, EXPERIMENTAL VACCINE ON THE PREVENTION OF NEWCASTLE DISEASE

Somsak Pakpinyo, Jiroj Sasipreeyajan, Niwat Chansiripornchai

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

A comparison of the efficacy of a Newcastle disease (ND), inactivated, experimental vaccine (NDIEV) and a ND, inactivated, commercial vaccine (NDICV) was under taken. Broiler chickens were divided into 5 groups of 112 birds each. All groups, except group 5 which served as unvaccinated controls, were given a live ND vaccine, strain B1 and different inactivated ND vaccines as follows. Groups 1 and 3 were given a NDIEV at 1 and 10 days old. And groups 2 and 4 were given a NDICV at 1 and 10 days old. When 21, 28, and 35 days old, 28 birds from each group were challenged with a ND virus. Sera was collected for HI antibodies, body weight, feed intake, morbidity, mortality, feed conversion rate and economic performance were observed during 21-31, 28-38, and 35-45 day periods. Results showed that HI antibody titers of NDICV were much better compared with those of a NDIEV. HI antibody titers of birds vaccinated at 10 days of age were higher than those of birds vaccinated at 1 day old. Morbidity, mortality, feed conversion rate, and economic performance of group 1 was worse than those of the other vaccinated groups.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A comparison of the efficacy of a Newcastle disease (ND), inactivated, experimental vaccine (NDIEV) and a ND, inactivated, commercial vaccine (NDICV) was under taken. Broiler chickens were divided into 5 groups of 112 birds each. All groups, except group 5 which served as unvaccinated controls, were given a live ND vaccine, strain B1 and different inactivated ND vaccines as follows. Groups 1 and 3 were given a NDIEV at 1 and 10 days old. And groups 2 and 4 were given a NDICV at 1 and 10 days old. When 21, 28, and 35 days old, 28 birds from each group were challenged with a ND virus. Sera was collected for HI antibodies, body weight, feed intake, morbidity, mortality, feed conversion rate and economic performance were observed during 21-31, 28-38, and 35-45 day periods. Results showed that HI antibody titers of NDICV were much better compared with those of a NDIEV. HI antibody titers of birds vaccinated at 10 days of age were higher than those of birds vaccinated at 1 day old. Morbidity, mortality, feed conversion rate, and economic performance of group 1 was worse than those of the other vaccinated groups.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A comparison of the efficacy of a Newcastle disease (ND), inactivated, experimental vaccine (NDIEV) and a ND, inactivated, commercial vaccine (NDICV) was under taken. Broiler chickens were divided into 5 groups of 112 birds each. All groups, except group 5 which served as unvaccinated controls, were given a live ND vaccine, strain B1 and different inactivated ND vaccines as follows. Groups 1 and 3 were given a NDIEV at 1 and 10 days old. And groups 2 and 4 were given a NDICV at 1 and 10 days old. When 21, 28, and 35 days old, 28 birds from each group were challenged with a ND virus. Sera was collected for HI antibodies, body weight, feed intake, morbidity, mortality, feed conversion rate and economic performance were observed during 21-31, 28-38, and 35-45 day periods. Results showed that HI antibody titers of NDICV were much better compared with those of a NDIEV. HI antibody titers of birds vaccinated at 10 days of age were higher than those of birds vaccinated at 1 day old. Morbidity, mortality, feed conversion rate, and economic performance of group 1 was worse than those of the other vaccinated groups.

Key concepts: Newcastle disease, Inactivated vaccine, Broiler, Titer, Antibody titer, Medicine, Antibody, Feed conversion ratio

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
AN INACTIVATED NEWCASTLE DISEASE VACCINE PART II: THE EFFICACY OF AN INACTIVATED, EXPERIMENTAL VACCINE ON THE PREVENTION OF NEWCASTLE DISEASE — Research Paper | ScholarLens