2002Unpublished venueRequires access

Alternative project execution approaches

T. Ireland

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Depending on the specific conditions of a given project, there are a number of alternatives available to the project owner for the execution approach. On the basis of the allocation of risks to the project participants, these options range from one extreme in which one contractor takes full responsibility for the project execution (full turnkey) to the other extreme in which the owner takes full control of the project for its implementation (full multiple contracting). Between these two extremes there are a number of other execution approaches that have been used in which the total project risk is shared between the owner and the contractors in varying proportions. Some specific project factors may influence the decision on the approach to be used, in particular the experience and resources of the project owner, the project time table, the scope of the project, the local conditions and other factors. This paper presents a review of these alternative approaches, along with a discussion of the influence of the above factors on the decision of the approach to be used. A brief outline of some important trends in the construction industry in North America is also presented, along with a discussion on their potential impact on the project performance.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Depending on the specific conditions of a given project, there are a number of alternatives available to the project owner for the execution approach. On the basis of the allocation of risks to the project participants, these options range from one extreme in which one contractor takes full responsibility for the project execution (full turnkey) to the other extreme in which the owner takes full control of the project for its implementation (full multiple contracting). Between these two extremes there are a number of other execution approaches that have been used in which the total project risk is shared between the owner and the contractors in varying proportions. Some specific project factors may influence the decision on the approach to be used, in particular the experience and resources of the project owner, the project time table, the scope of the project, the local conditions and other factors. This paper presents a review of these alternative approaches, along with a discussion of the influence of the above factors on the decision of the approach to be used. A brief outline of some important trends in the construction industry in North America is also presented, along with a discussion on their potential impact on the project performance.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Depending on the specific conditions of a given project, there are a number of alternatives available to the project owner for the execution approach. On the basis of the allocation of risks to the project participants, these options range from one extreme in which one contractor takes full responsibility for the project execution (full turnkey) to the other extreme in which the owner takes full control of the project for its implementation (full multiple contracting). Between these two extremes there are a number of other execution approaches that have been used in which the total project risk is shared between the owner and the contractors in varying proportions. Some specific project factors may influence the decision on the approach to be used, in particular the experience and resources of the project owner, the project time table, the scope of the project, the local conditions and other factors. This paper presents a review of these alternative approaches, along with a discussion of the influence of the above factors on the decision of the approach to be used. A brief outline of some important trends in the construction industry in North America is also presented, along with a discussion on their potential impact on the project performance.

Key concepts: Turnkey, Scope (computer science), Computer science, Project manager, Project management, Project management triangle, Project team, Table (database)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Alternative project execution approaches — Research Paper | ScholarLens