Responsibility in the Construction Industry
James Lefter
Abstract
James Lefter
Abstract
No member of the owner/design professional/constructor team knows all responsibilities or levels of risk assumed when entering into a design or construction contract. This article discusses the construction industry's need for better responsibility standards as well as back-up systems of responsibility. It also provides recommendations to promote teamwork in the design and construction of major projects. In the context of responsibility, the construction industry can be characterized as dangerous, litigious, and prone to design and construction errors. Responsibility assignments are often made in court, but industry organizations have made significant progress toward the development of consensus reasonability guidelines. This author suggests that the assignment of responsibilities recommended in these documents should be made mandatory. The author also suggests the need to revise the low bid contractor selection system by prequalifying bidders, adding quality issues to the bid evaluation process, considering the bidder's safety record, and using a partnering agreement.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
No member of the owner/design professional/constructor team knows all responsibilities or levels of risk assumed when entering into a design or construction contract. This article discusses the construction industry's need for better responsibility standards as well as back-up systems of responsibility. It also provides recommendations to promote teamwork in the design and construction of major projects. In the context of responsibility, the construction industry can be characterized as dangerous, litigious, and prone to design and construction errors. Responsibility assignments are often made in court, but industry organizations have made significant progress toward the development of consensus reasonability guidelines. This author suggests that the assignment of responsibilities recommended in these documents should be made mandatory. The author also suggests the need to revise the low bid contractor selection system by prequalifying bidders, adding quality issues to the bid evaluation process, considering the bidder's safety record, and using a partnering agreement.
Key concepts: Construction industry, Context (archaeology), Quality (philosophy), Teamwork, Process (computing), Business, Construction engineering, Engineering