1991PubMedRequires access

The effect of faculty private practice experience on appropriate charging for professional services.

F H Lawler, Joanna Purvis, J A Paris, Rebecca Horner

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

Private practice experience is widely considered invaluable for academic family physicians, especially for clinical efficiency and for charging appropriately for professional services. This study tested the hypothesis that faculty members with private practice experience charged more appropriately for professional services. Patient-physician encounters were rated in terms of propriety of charges by consensus of two faculty physicians and compared to the actual level of service marked on the encounter form. Private practice experience for faculty resulted in less undercharging (21% of encounters undercharged versus 31% for faculty without that experience, P = .03). Physicians with private practice experience undercharged on average $.36 per encounter, versus $1.94 for providers without that experience (Kruskal-Wallis test, P = .27). Physicians with private practice experience also tended to perform more procedures but not to bill for more. Academic family physicians with private practice experience demonstrated more appropriate billing practices for professional services, but ideally preference for this type of academic physician should be based on other attributes, such as breadth of experience and efficiency in patient care.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Private practice experience is widely considered invaluable for academic family physicians, especially for clinical efficiency and for charging appropriately for professional services. This study tested the hypothesis that faculty members with private practice experience charged more appropriately for professional services. Patient-physician encounters were rated in terms of propriety of charges by consensus of two faculty physicians and compared to the actual level of service marked on the encounter form. Private practice experience for faculty resulted in less undercharging (21% of encounters undercharged versus 31% for faculty without that experience, P = .03). Physicians with private practice experience undercharged on average $.36 per encounter, versus $1.94 for providers without that experience (Kruskal-Wallis test, P = .27). Physicians with private practice experience also tended to perform more procedures but not to bill for more. Academic family physicians with private practice experience demonstrated more appropriate billing practices for professional services, but ideally preference for this type of academic physician should be based on other attributes, such as breadth of experience and efficiency in patient care.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Private practice experience is widely considered invaluable for academic family physicians, especially for clinical efficiency and for charging appropriately for professional services. This study tested the hypothesis that faculty members with private practice experience charged more appropriately for professional services. Patient-physician encounters were rated in terms of propriety of charges by consensus of two faculty physicians and compared to the actual level of service marked on the encounter form. Private practice experience for faculty resulted in less undercharging (21% of encounters undercharged versus 31% for faculty without that experience, P = .03). Physicians with private practice experience undercharged on average $.36 per encounter, versus $1.94 for providers without that experience (Kruskal-Wallis test, P = .27). Physicians with private practice experience also tended to perform more procedures but not to bill for more. Academic family physicians with private practice experience demonstrated more appropriate billing practices for professional services, but ideally preference for this type of academic physician should be based on other attributes, such as breadth of experience and efficiency in patient care.

Key concepts: Private practice, Preference, Patient care, Service (business), Family medicine, Medicine, Medical education, Test (biology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The effect of faculty private practice experience on appropriate charging for professional services. — Research Paper | ScholarLens