2016Edward Elgar Publishing eBooksRequires access

Is administrative law still relevant? How the battle of sanctions has shaped EU criminal law

Ester Herlin‐Karnell

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

The idea of this chapter is to investigate the extent to which the EU legislator still invokes administrative sanctions to deal with irregularities in the market and explain why the history of administrative sanctions has shaped modern EU criminal law. Administrative sanctions have always formed a crucial part of the EU’s enforcement strategy, particularly with regard to competition fines as well as sanctions in the domain of agriculture and fisheries policies in the EU. Yet with the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, and thereby the granted legislative competences in criminal matters, one would perhaps have thought that there was no need for administrative sanctions in the EU anymore. The distinction administrative law versus criminal law used to be the main point of departure for the debate on sanctions back in the old days when the pillars of the EU still determined the realm of competence of the EU’s involvement in criminal law proper.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The idea of this chapter is to investigate the extent to which the EU legislator still invokes administrative sanctions to deal with irregularities in the market and explain why the history of administrative sanctions has shaped modern EU criminal law. Administrative sanctions have always formed a crucial part of the EU’s enforcement strategy, particularly with regard to competition fines as well as sanctions in the domain of agriculture and fisheries policies in the EU. Yet with the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, and thereby the granted legislative competences in criminal matters, one would perhaps have thought that there was no need for administrative sanctions in the EU anymore. The distinction administrative law versus criminal law used to be the main point of departure for the debate on sanctions back in the old days when the pillars of the EU still determined the realm of competence of the EU’s involvement in criminal law proper.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The idea of this chapter is to investigate the extent to which the EU legislator still invokes administrative sanctions to deal with irregularities in the market and explain why the history of administrative sanctions has shaped modern EU criminal law. Administrative sanctions have always formed a crucial part of the EU’s enforcement strategy, particularly with regard to competition fines as well as sanctions in the domain of agriculture and fisheries policies in the EU. Yet with the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, and thereby the granted legislative competences in criminal matters, one would perhaps have thought that there was no need for administrative sanctions in the EU anymore. The distinction administrative law versus criminal law used to be the main point of departure for the debate on sanctions back in the old days when the pillars of the EU still determined the realm of competence of the EU’s involvement in criminal law proper.

Key concepts: Sanctions, Political science, Law, Legislator, Criminal law, Treaty, Enforcement, Administrative law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Is administrative law still relevant? How the battle of sanctions has shaped EU criminal law — Research Paper | ScholarLens