Competitive bidding with a bid floor
Bin R. Chen, Yi‐Bin Chiu
Abstract
Bin R. Chen, Yi‐Bin Chiu
Abstract
We study competitive bidding with an explicit bid floor, motivated by minimum wage legislation and minimum labor standards. We derive the equilibrium strategies in, and compare the expected procurement costs among, the first-price, second-price, English, and Dutch auctions in a private-cost model. For the English auction, we also consider a variant in which each seller can terminate the auction by jumping down to sell at the price floor. We find that the first-price auction and the aforementioned jump-down English auction lead to a lower expected procurement cost than under the second-price auction and the standard English auction.
OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We study competitive bidding with an explicit bid floor, motivated by minimum wage legislation and minimum labor standards. We derive the equilibrium strategies in, and compare the expected procurement costs among, the first-price, second-price, English, and Dutch auctions in a private-cost model. For the English auction, we also consider a variant in which each seller can terminate the auction by jumping down to sell at the price floor. We find that the first-price auction and the aforementioned jump-down English auction lead to a lower expected procurement cost than under the second-price auction and the standard English auction.
Key concepts: English auction, Bidding, Proxy bid, Dutch auction, Microeconomics, Auction theory, Revenue equivalence, Reverse auction