Engineering application and economics of LIMB (limestone injection/multistage burners)
N. Kaplan, D.G. Lachapelle, J. Chappell
Abstract
N. Kaplan, D.G. Lachapelle, J. Chappell
Abstract
The paper describes the use of an EPA LIMB cost model, in conjunction with cost and performance models for flue-gas desulfurization (FGD), to compare these two technologies under similar premises. (NOTE: The performance goals of LIMB, EPA's acronym for Limestone Injection/Multistage Burners for use in SO/sub 2//NOx control for coal-fired boilers, are 50-60% reduction of SO/sub 2/ and NOx for retrofit systems, and achievement of New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for SO/sub 2/ and NOx for application on new utility boilers. These performance requirements, furthermore, are to be achieved at significantly lower cost than that for FGD, the major control technology alternative.) For a new 500-MW unit burning 1.92%-S coal and achieving control to meet NSPS, costs per ton of SO/sub 2/ removed are estimated to be $1377, $771, and $921 for limestone FGD, lime spray drying, and LIMB using calcitic hydrate, respectively. At 0.48% S in the coal, these costs are estimated at $3715, $1954, and $1134 for limestone FGD, lime spray drying, and LIMB, respectively. For a 300 MW retrofit system, costs per ton of SO/sub 2/ removed for wet limestone FGD and LIMB using calcitic hydrate on a 1.92% S coal application are $1359 and $844, respectively.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The paper describes the use of an EPA LIMB cost model, in conjunction with cost and performance models for flue-gas desulfurization (FGD), to compare these two technologies under similar premises. (NOTE: The performance goals of LIMB, EPA's acronym for Limestone Injection/Multistage Burners for use in SO/sub 2//NOx control for coal-fired boilers, are 50-60% reduction of SO/sub 2/ and NOx for retrofit systems, and achievement of New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for SO/sub 2/ and NOx for application on new utility boilers. These performance requirements, furthermore, are to be achieved at significantly lower cost than that for FGD, the major control technology alternative.) For a new 500-MW unit burning 1.92%-S coal and achieving control to meet NSPS, costs per ton of SO/sub 2/ removed are estimated to be $1377, $771, and $921 for limestone FGD, lime spray drying, and LIMB using calcitic hydrate, respectively. At 0.48% S in the coal, these costs are estimated at $3715, $1954, and $1134 for limestone FGD, lime spray drying, and LIMB, respectively. For a 300 MW retrofit system, costs per ton of SO/sub 2/ removed for wet limestone FGD and LIMB using calcitic hydrate on a 1.92% S coal application are $1359 and $844, respectively.
Key concepts: Flue-gas desulfurization, Waste management, Coal, Lime, NOx, Flue gas, Engineering, Environmental science