1995•PubMedRequires access

Use of nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity in the evaluation of male erectile dysfunction.

Laurence A. Levine, Eric L. Lenting

Open publisher page 111 citations

Abstract

The role of nocturnal penile tumescence monitoring in helping to distinguish psychogenic from organic impotence has been the subject of research for several decades. Tumescence monitoring alone, while it does provide useful information, imposes limitations on the diagnostic inferences that can be drawn concerning the adequacy of erectile function. This led to the development of nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity monitoring (NPTR). Although there is no single test that enables physicians to diagnose the precise etiology and degree of impotence, NPTR provides useful information in a rather noninvasive and inexpensive manner allowing one to direct patients to the appropriate treatment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The role of nocturnal penile tumescence monitoring in helping to distinguish psychogenic from organic impotence has been the subject of research for several decades. Tumescence monitoring alone, while it does provide useful information, imposes limitations on the diagnostic inferences that can be drawn concerning the adequacy of erectile function. This led to the development of nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity monitoring (NPTR). Although there is no single test that enables physicians to diagnose the precise etiology and degree of impotence, NPTR provides useful information in a rather noninvasive and inexpensive manner allowing one to direct patients to the appropriate treatment.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 111 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The role of nocturnal penile tumescence monitoring in helping to distinguish psychogenic from organic impotence has been the subject of research for several decades. Tumescence monitoring alone, while it does provide useful information, imposes limitations on the diagnostic inferences that can be drawn concerning the adequacy of erectile function. This led to the development of nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity monitoring (NPTR). Although there is no single test that enables physicians to diagnose the precise etiology and degree of impotence, NPTR provides useful information in a rather noninvasive and inexpensive manner allowing one to direct patients to the appropriate treatment.

Key concepts: Nocturnal penile tumescence, Medicine, Psychogenic disease, Tumescence, Erectile dysfunction, Erectile function, Etiology, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Use of nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity in the evaluation of male erectile dysfunction. — Research Paper | ScholarLens