1991•British Journal of UrologyRequires access

Erectile Response to Visual Erotic Stimuli Before and After Intracavernosal Papaverine, and its Relationship to Nocturnal Penile Tumescence and Psychometric Assessment

John Bancroft, Gordon F. Smith, M. MUNOZ, P. RONALD

Open publisher page 15 citations

Abstract

Three methods of assessing erectile capacity--nocturnal penile tumescence (NPT), response to visual erotic stimuli (VES) and to intracavernosal papaverine (ICI)--have been assessed in 42 men presenting with erectile dysfunction. There was some overlap but also important differences between the 3 measures. Subjects were divided into "high" and "low" NPT groups. The "high" group produced greater erectile responses to both VES and ICI. The combination of VES and ICI was the best discriminator of the two NPT groups, and may be of diagnostic value, particularly in younger men, reducing the need for repeated injections and higher doses of papaverine. In the "low" NPT group, presumed predominantly organic, the ICI response correlated better than the VES response with NPT. In the "high" NPT group, the opposite applied, suggesting that in "psychogenic" cases, response to ICI may be modified by psychological mechanisms which could be of aetiological importance and which deserve further study. These three methods should be regarded as measuring different aspects of erectile function and not as alternative diagnostic procedures. More research is required before their respective diagnostic values are established.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Three methods of assessing erectile capacity--nocturnal penile tumescence (NPT), response to visual erotic stimuli (VES) and to intracavernosal papaverine (ICI)--have been assessed in 42 men presenting with erectile dysfunction. There was some overlap but also important differences between the 3 measures. Subjects were divided into "high" and "low" NPT groups. The "high" group produced greater erectile responses to both VES and ICI. The combination of VES and ICI was the best discriminator of the two NPT groups, and may be of diagnostic value, particularly in younger men, reducing the need for repeated injections and higher doses of papaverine. In the "low" NPT group, presumed predominantly organic, the ICI response correlated better than the VES response with NPT. In the "high" NPT group, the opposite applied, suggesting that in "psychogenic" cases, response to ICI may be modified by psychological mechanisms which could be of aetiological importance and which deserve further study. These three methods should be regarded as measuring different aspects of erectile function and not as alternative diagnostic procedures. More research is required before their respective diagnostic values are established.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Three methods of assessing erectile capacity--nocturnal penile tumescence (NPT), response to visual erotic stimuli (VES) and to intracavernosal papaverine (ICI)--have been assessed in 42 men presenting with erectile dysfunction. There was some overlap but also important differences between the 3 measures. Subjects were divided into "high" and "low" NPT groups. The "high" group produced greater erectile responses to both VES and ICI. The combination of VES and ICI was the best discriminator of the two NPT groups, and may be of diagnostic value, particularly in younger men, reducing the need for repeated injections and higher doses of papaverine. In the "low" NPT group, presumed predominantly organic, the ICI response correlated better than the VES response with NPT. In the "high" NPT group, the opposite applied, suggesting that in "psychogenic" cases, response to ICI may be modified by psychological mechanisms which could be of aetiological importance and which deserve further study. These three methods should be regarded as measuring different aspects of erectile function and not as alternative diagnostic procedures. More research is required before their respective diagnostic values are established.

Key concepts: Nocturnal penile tumescence, Papaverine, Erectile dysfunction, Tumescence, Psychogenic disease, Medicine, Erectile function, Audiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Erectile Response to Visual Erotic Stimuli Before and After Intracavernosal Papaverine, and its Relationship to Nocturnal Penile Tumescence and Psychometric Assessment — Research Paper | ScholarLens