1997Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)Requires access

A Strategic Assessment of South Asia: Prescription for US Foreign Policy

Tacik, Henryk, Thomas Murphy, Lisi, Stephen S.

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The United States views South Asia as an important emerging region containing one fifth of the world's population and the world's largest democracy. South Asia has the potential to become a major economic market in the next 25 years if regional disputes and transnational problems can be effectively managed. This paper addresses key issues affecting the region from the perspectives of the major state actors and prescribes potential U.S. foreign policy choices. Territorial disputes between India and Pakistan have persisted since their independence from British colonialism in 1947. The tensions between these two countries have occupied the majority of U.S. foreign policy in South Asia. Until the collapse of the Soviet Union, U.S. policy toward the region was framed by a Cold War strategy of communist containment. It was focused more on thwarting Soviet communist expansion than on a grand strategy of pursuing long-term U.S. interests in the region. Today, 26 years after the last of three major conflicts, the territorial and ethnic-religious tensions associated with nuclear proliferation remain. However, the post-Cold War climate provides an opportunity for politically constructive dialog to reduce tensions. Although the United States does not have any vital interests challenged by the region, proliferation of WMD and missile technology are threats to regional stability. Territorial disputes over Kashmir and the Siachen Glacier could potentially result in a nuclear disaster. The United States may be a mediator if called upon, but must recognize India as the regional leader and encourage both India and Pakistan to assume responsibility for resolving their conflict. The U.S. Congress has constrained the ability of the President to conduct foreign policy as he might otherwise prefer. Therefore, innovative ways to build confidences, Track II diplomacy, and mediation by the United Nations or China will be key in future diplomatic efforts to stabilize the region.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The United States views South Asia as an important emerging region containing one fifth of the world's population and the world's largest democracy. South Asia has the potential to become a major economic market in the next 25 years if regional disputes and transnational problems can be effectively managed. This paper addresses key issues affecting the region from the perspectives of the major state actors and prescribes potential U.S. foreign policy choices. Territorial disputes between India and Pakistan have persisted since their independence from British colonialism in 1947. The tensions between these two countries have occupied the majority of U.S. foreign policy in South Asia. Until the collapse of the Soviet Union, U.S. policy toward the region was framed by a Cold War strategy of communist containment. It was focused more on thwarting Soviet communist expansion than on a grand strategy of pursuing long-term U.S. interests in the region. Today, 26 years after the last of three major conflicts, the territorial and ethnic-religious tensions associated with nuclear proliferation remain. However, the post-Cold War climate provides an opportunity for politically constructive dialog to reduce tensions. Although the United States does not have any vital interests challenged by the region, proliferation of WMD and missile technology are threats to regional stability. Territorial disputes over Kashmir and the Siachen Glacier could potentially result in a nuclear disaster. The United States may be a mediator if called upon, but must recognize India as the regional leader and encourage both India and Pakistan to assume responsibility for resolving their conflict. The U.S. Congress has constrained the ability of the President to conduct foreign policy as he might otherwise prefer. Therefore, innovative ways to build confidences, Track II diplomacy, and mediation by the United Nations or China will be key in future diplomatic efforts to stabilize the region.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The United States views South Asia as an important emerging region containing one fifth of the world's population and the world's largest democracy. South Asia has the potential to become a major economic market in the next 25 years if regional disputes and transnational problems can be effectively managed. This paper addresses key issues affecting the region from the perspectives of the major state actors and prescribes potential U.S. foreign policy choices. Territorial disputes between India and Pakistan have persisted since their independence from British colonialism in 1947. The tensions between these two countries have occupied the majority of U.S. foreign policy in South Asia. Until the collapse of the Soviet Union, U.S. policy toward the region was framed by a Cold War strategy of communist containment. It was focused more on thwarting Soviet communist expansion than on a grand strategy of pursuing long-term U.S. interests in the region. Today, 26 years after the last of three major conflicts, the territorial and ethnic-religious tensions associated with nuclear proliferation remain. However, the post-Cold War climate provides an opportunity for politically constructive dialog to reduce tensions. Although the United States does not have any vital interests challenged by the region, proliferation of WMD and missile technology are threats to regional stability. Territorial disputes over Kashmir and the Siachen Glacier could potentially result in a nuclear disaster. The United States may be a mediator if called upon, but must recognize India as the regional leader and encourage both India and Pakistan to assume responsibility for resolving their conflict. The U.S. Congress has constrained the ability of the President to conduct foreign policy as he might otherwise prefer. Therefore, innovative ways to build confidences, Track II diplomacy, and mediation by the United Nations or China will be key in future diplomatic efforts to stabilize the region.

Key concepts: Foreign policy, Political science, Population, Communism, Political economy, State (computer science), Development economics, Democracy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Strategic Assessment of South Asia: Prescription for US Foreign Policy — Research Paper | ScholarLens