2003Unpublished venueRequires access

Modular avionics system architecture decision support system

Thomas J. Dickman, Thomas M. Roberts

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

A methodology for evaluating modular avionics applications in terms of life-cycle cost and system effectiveness is reported. The methodology is to be used to compare alternative modular architecture strategies as well as conventional strategies for introducing avionics into new or existing weapon systems. The process described is intended to be a flexible means of evaluating postulated alternatives for US Air Force-wide implementation of modular avionics. The analysis is expected to be performed using data normally available during the conceptual phase of a development program. Functions performed by avionics have been limited to navigation, communications, and some portion of fire control. The role of avionics, however, has steadily increased with each new generation of aircraft. It is argued that commonality of avionics elements within and among weapon systems may reduce both development cost and development risk.>

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A methodology for evaluating modular avionics applications in terms of life-cycle cost and system effectiveness is reported. The methodology is to be used to compare alternative modular architecture strategies as well as conventional strategies for introducing avionics into new or existing weapon systems. The process described is intended to be a flexible means of evaluating postulated alternatives for US Air Force-wide implementation of modular avionics. The analysis is expected to be performed using data normally available during the conceptual phase of a development program. Functions performed by avionics have been limited to navigation, communications, and some portion of fire control. The role of avionics, however, has steadily increased with each new generation of aircraft. It is argued that commonality of avionics elements within and among weapon systems may reduce both development cost and development risk.>

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A methodology for evaluating modular avionics applications in terms of life-cycle cost and system effectiveness is reported. The methodology is to be used to compare alternative modular architecture strategies as well as conventional strategies for introducing avionics into new or existing weapon systems. The process described is intended to be a flexible means of evaluating postulated alternatives for US Air Force-wide implementation of modular avionics. The analysis is expected to be performed using data normally available during the conceptual phase of a development program. Functions performed by avionics have been limited to navigation, communications, and some portion of fire control. The role of avionics, however, has steadily increased with each new generation of aircraft. It is argued that commonality of avionics elements within and among weapon systems may reduce both development cost and development risk.>

Key concepts: Avionics, Integrated modular avionics, Modular design, Systems engineering, Architecture, Avionics software, Computer science, Process (computing)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Modular avionics system architecture decision support system — Research Paper | ScholarLens