1973Highway Research RecordRequires access

Regulation of buses in cities

Gabriel Roth

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

An examination of the main types of regulation - control of routes, rates, timetables, and standards - applied to the provision of bus services in cities and the effects of this regulation on travelers is presented. The following conclusions are drawn: (i) safety, noise, and pollution standards should be established; (ii) timetables should be regulated, possibly in the form of subsidies to operators who keep them; (iii) route operation and fares need not be controlled; and (iv) the introduction of new bus services should not be restricted. The need for bus subsidies does not justify the public operation or economic regulation of bus services. Grants related to passenger mileage on all or selected routes appear to be the most desirable form of subsidy, because they directly encourage the provision of services desired by travelers.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An examination of the main types of regulation - control of routes, rates, timetables, and standards - applied to the provision of bus services in cities and the effects of this regulation on travelers is presented. The following conclusions are drawn: (i) safety, noise, and pollution standards should be established; (ii) timetables should be regulated, possibly in the form of subsidies to operators who keep them; (iii) route operation and fares need not be controlled; and (iv) the introduction of new bus services should not be restricted. The need for bus subsidies does not justify the public operation or economic regulation of bus services. Grants related to passenger mileage on all or selected routes appear to be the most desirable form of subsidy, because they directly encourage the provision of services desired by travelers.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

An examination of the main types of regulation - control of routes, rates, timetables, and standards - applied to the provision of bus services in cities and the effects of this regulation on travelers is presented. The following conclusions are drawn: (i) safety, noise, and pollution standards should be established; (ii) timetables should be regulated, possibly in the form of subsidies to operators who keep them; (iii) route operation and fares need not be controlled; and (iv) the introduction of new bus services should not be restricted. The need for bus subsidies does not justify the public operation or economic regulation of bus services. Grants related to passenger mileage on all or selected routes appear to be the most desirable form of subsidy, because they directly encourage the provision of services desired by travelers.

Key concepts: Subsidy, Public transport, Transport engineering, Business, Control (management), Public economics, Engineering, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Regulation of buses in cities — Research Paper | ScholarLens