1980Unpublished venueRequires access

GOVERNMENT POLICY CHOICES AND PUBLIC TRANSPORT OPERATIONS IN SINGAPORE

J A Chee-Meoww

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Public transport in urban environments is usually emphasized since it inter alia helps to reduce private-car traffic and thus ease congestion. Yet public transport, especially the bus system, is increasingly faced with many problems in numerous cities because of such difficulties as recovering operational costs, reliability and efficiency of service, and poor standards of ridership comfort. Measures, such as the use of subsidies, have been introduced by many urban governments to sustain the public transport system, but the extent of their effectiveness varies. The Singapore government's approach to the public transport system is to intervene actively by revamping the poorly managed and heterogeneous group of public transport operations. Among the measures taken have been the progressive reorganization of the dozen operators into a single major operator (namely,the Singapore bus service or sbs), the active control by the government of that company's management and operation through the appointment of able bureaucrats to fill the top management and operational positions, the rationalization of bus routes, and the introduction of various supplementary schemes for private owners of school buses and other high-passenger-capacity vehicles to absorb part of the passenger demand during peak hours. The government's attitude that subsidies should not be extended to public transport - while debatable - has so far shown to be workable, and commuters are paying the economic costs of the journeys. Compared with the period prior to reorganization, the public transport system can be considered as substantially improved in regard to extensive network spread, service frequency, vehicle reliability, and comfort. For the major (and main) bus operator, the Singapore bus service, continued upgrading and improvements are expected for, notwithstanding the decision on the introduction of the mrt, its operations will form the backbone of public transportation in Singapore. (Author/TRRL)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Public transport in urban environments is usually emphasized since it inter alia helps to reduce private-car traffic and thus ease congestion. Yet public transport, especially the bus system, is increasingly faced with many problems in numerous cities because of such difficulties as recovering operational costs, reliability and efficiency of service, and poor standards of ridership comfort. Measures, such as the use of subsidies, have been introduced by many urban governments to sustain the public transport system, but the extent of their effectiveness varies. The Singapore government's approach to the public transport system is to intervene actively by revamping the poorly managed and heterogeneous group of public transport operations. Among the measures taken have been the progressive reorganization of the dozen operators into a single major operator (namely,the Singapore bus service or sbs), the active control by the government of that company's management and operation through the appointment of able bureaucrats to fill the top management and operational positions, the rationalization of bus routes, and the introduction of various supplementary schemes for private owners of school buses and other high-passenger-capacity vehicles to absorb part of the passenger demand during peak hours. The government's attitude that subsidies should not be extended to public transport - while debatable - has so far shown to be workable, and commuters are paying the economic costs of the journeys. Compared with the period prior to reorganization, the public transport system can be considered as substantially improved in regard to extensive network spread, service frequency, vehicle reliability, and comfort. For the major (and main) bus operator, the Singapore bus service, continued upgrading and improvements are expected for, notwithstanding the decision on the introduction of the mrt, its operations will form the backbone of public transportation in Singapore. (Author/TRRL)

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Public transport in urban environments is usually emphasized since it inter alia helps to reduce private-car traffic and thus ease congestion. Yet public transport, especially the bus system, is increasingly faced with many problems in numerous cities because of such difficulties as recovering operational costs, reliability and efficiency of service, and poor standards of ridership comfort. Measures, such as the use of subsidies, have been introduced by many urban governments to sustain the public transport system, but the extent of their effectiveness varies. The Singapore government's approach to the public transport system is to intervene actively by revamping the poorly managed and heterogeneous group of public transport operations. Among the measures taken have been the progressive reorganization of the dozen operators into a single major operator (namely,the Singapore bus service or sbs), the active control by the government of that company's management and operation through the appointment of able bureaucrats to fill the top management and operational positions, the rationalization of bus routes, and the introduction of various supplementary schemes for private owners of school buses and other high-passenger-capacity vehicles to absorb part of the passenger demand during peak hours. The government's attitude that subsidies should not be extended to public transport - while debatable - has so far shown to be workable, and commuters are paying the economic costs of the journeys. Compared with the period prior to reorganization, the public transport system can be considered as substantially improved in regard to extensive network spread, service frequency, vehicle reliability, and comfort. For the major (and main) bus operator, the Singapore bus service, continued upgrading and improvements are expected for, notwithstanding the decision on the introduction of the mrt, its operations will form the backbone of public transportation in Singapore. (Author/TRRL)

Key concepts: Public transport, Subsidy, Rationalization (economics), Business, Government (linguistics), Private transport, Service (business), Transport engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
GOVERNMENT POLICY CHOICES AND PUBLIC TRANSPORT OPERATIONS IN SINGAPORE — Research Paper | ScholarLens