Merit Pay and the Evaluation Problem: Why Most Merit Pay Plans Fail and a Few Survive
Richard J. Murnane, David K. Cohen
Abstract
Richard J. Murnane, David K. Cohen
Abstract
Richard J. Murnane and David K. Cohen use the framework of microeconomics to account for the short lives of most merit pay plans. They demonstrate that teaching is not an activity that satisfies the conditions under which performance-based pay is an efficient method of compensating workers. They then show that merit pay plans survive in a few school districts,in part because the districts are special and in part because the merit pay plans are quite different from conventional notions of performance-based pay.
OpenAlex reports 387 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Richard J. Murnane and David K. Cohen use the framework of microeconomics to account for the short lives of most merit pay plans. They demonstrate that teaching is not an activity that satisfies the conditions under which performance-based pay is an efficient method of compensating workers. They then show that merit pay plans survive in a few school districts,in part because the districts are special and in part because the merit pay plans are quite different from conventional notions of performance-based pay.
Key concepts: Merit pay, Figure of merit, Pay for performance, Economics, Actuarial science, Microeconomics, Computer science, Incentive