1991Journal of BacteriologyOpen access

Limits to the role of palindromy in deletion formation

Kathleen Weston‐Hafer, Douglas E. Berg

Open full text 24 citations

Abstract

We tested the effect of palindromy on deletion formation. This involved a study of reversion of insertion mutations in the pBR322 amp gene at a site where deletions end either in 9-bp direct repeats or in adjoining 4-bp direct repeats. Inserts of palindromic DNAs ranging from 10 to more than 26 bp and related nonpalindromic DNAs were compared. The frequency of deletions (selected as Ampr revertants) was stimulated by palindromy only at lengths greater than 26 bp. The 4-bp direct repeats, one component of which is located in the palindromic insert, were used preferentially as deletion endpoints with palindromes of at least 18 bp but not of 16 or 10 bp. We interpret these results with a model of slippage during DNA replication. Because deletion frequency and deletion endpoint location depend differently on palindrome length, we propose that different factors commit a molecule to undergo deletion and determine exactly where deletion endpoints will be.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We tested the effect of palindromy on deletion formation. This involved a study of reversion of insertion mutations in the pBR322 amp gene at a site where deletions end either in 9-bp direct repeats or in adjoining 4-bp direct repeats. Inserts of palindromic DNAs ranging from 10 to more than 26 bp and related nonpalindromic DNAs were compared. The frequency of deletions (selected as Ampr revertants) was stimulated by palindromy only at lengths greater than 26 bp. The 4-bp direct repeats, one component of which is located in the palindromic insert, were used preferentially as deletion endpoints with palindromes of at least 18 bp but not of 16 or 10 bp. We interpret these results with a model of slippage during DNA replication. Because deletion frequency and deletion endpoint location depend differently on palindrome length, we propose that different factors commit a molecule to undergo deletion and determine exactly where deletion endpoints will be.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We tested the effect of palindromy on deletion formation. This involved a study of reversion of insertion mutations in the pBR322 amp gene at a site where deletions end either in 9-bp direct repeats or in adjoining 4-bp direct repeats. Inserts of palindromic DNAs ranging from 10 to more than 26 bp and related nonpalindromic DNAs were compared. The frequency of deletions (selected as Ampr revertants) was stimulated by palindromy only at lengths greater than 26 bp. The 4-bp direct repeats, one component of which is located in the palindromic insert, were used preferentially as deletion endpoints with palindromes of at least 18 bp but not of 16 or 10 bp. We interpret these results with a model of slippage during DNA replication. Because deletion frequency and deletion endpoint location depend differently on palindrome length, we propose that different factors commit a molecule to undergo deletion and determine exactly where deletion endpoints will be.

Key concepts: Palindrome, Biology, Palindromic sequence, Genetics, Direct repeat, Point mutation, Inverted repeat, Gene

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Limits to the role of palindromy in deletion formation — Research Paper | ScholarLens