2008•Research Repository (Kingston University London)Open access

Employee Engagement: A Literature Review

Subgupta Kular, Mark Gatenby, Chris Rees, Emma Soane, Katie Truss

Open full text 277 citations

Abstract

This working paper reports the findings of a literature review dissertation undertaken by Sandeep Kular in 2007, which formed part of her MA Human Resource Management degree at Kingston University.The dissertation contributed towards the development of a conceptual framework for the establishment of the Kingston Business School Employee Engagement Consortium, a research partnership aimed at developing knowledge and understanding of employee engagement, its drivers, and its consequences.Our interest in employee engagement began in 2006, when we were approached by the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) to undertake a survey of levels of engagement in the UK workforce.Our findings were published in the CIPD report Working Life: Employee Attitudes and Engagement (Truss et al 2006).We found that levels of engagement nationally were low, but that high levels of engagement were associated with a host of positive outcomes for individuals and their employers.Our study revealed the value of engagement, but we wanted to know more about how engagement levels vary across different sectors and contexts.Sandeep's work formed part of the next steps in developing this further research process.The Consortium is now moving ahead with sharing knowledge and developing new insights into the nature of employee engagement and its impact on organisations.Five key areas are being explored: What does 'employee engagement' mean?; How can engagement be managed?;What are the consequences of engagement for organisations?; How does engagement relate to other individual characteristics?; How is engagement related to employee voice and representation?Sandeep's dissertation involved exploring some of the relevant literature around each of these issues.Specifically she focused on three key questions:1. How has employee engagement been conceptualised?2. How do individual differences relate to employee engagement? 3. How does employee involvement relate to employee engagement?This working paper summarises a broad range of academic literature under each of these headings.We found it a useful contribution to our subsequent work, and we are grateful to Sandeep for pursuing her dissertation research with such depth and rigour.I trust it will be of interest to anyone wishing to know more about this increasingly important area of management practice.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This working paper reports the findings of a literature review dissertation undertaken by Sandeep Kular in 2007, which formed part of her MA Human Resource Management degree at Kingston University.The dissertation contributed towards the development of a conceptual framework for the establishment of the Kingston Business School Employee Engagement Consortium, a research partnership aimed at developing knowledge and understanding of employee engagement, its drivers, and its consequences.Our interest in employee engagement began in 2006, when we were approached by the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) to undertake a survey of levels of engagement in the UK workforce.Our findings were published in the CIPD report Working Life: Employee Attitudes and Engagement (Truss et al 2006).We found that levels of engagement nationally were low, but that high levels of engagement were associated with a host of positive outcomes for individuals and their employers.Our study revealed the value of engagement, but we wanted to know more about how engagement levels vary across different sectors and contexts.Sandeep's work formed part of the next steps in developing this further research process.The Consortium is now moving ahead with sharing knowledge and developing new insights into the nature of employee engagement and its impact on organisations.Five key areas are being explored: What does 'employee engagement' mean?; How can engagement be managed?;What are the consequences of engagement for organisations?; How does engagement relate to other individual characteristics?; How is engagement related to employee voice and representation?Sandeep's dissertation involved exploring some of the relevant literature around each of these issues.Specifically she focused on three key questions:1. How has employee engagement been conceptualised?2. How do individual differences relate to employee engagement? 3. How does employee involvement relate to employee engagement?This working paper summarises a broad range of academic literature under each of these headings.We found it a useful contribution to our subsequent work, and we are grateful to Sandeep for pursuing her dissertation research with such depth and rigour.I trust it will be of interest to anyone wishing to know more about this increasingly important area of management practice.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 277 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This working paper reports the findings of a literature review dissertation undertaken by Sandeep Kular in 2007, which formed part of her MA Human Resource Management degree at Kingston University.The dissertation contributed towards the development of a conceptual framework for the establishment of the Kingston Business School Employee Engagement Consortium, a research partnership aimed at developing knowledge and understanding of employee engagement, its drivers, and its consequences.Our interest in employee engagement began in 2006, when we were approached by the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) to undertake a survey of levels of engagement in the UK workforce.Our findings were published in the CIPD report Working Life: Employee Attitudes and Engagement (Truss et al 2006).We found that levels of engagement nationally were low, but that high levels of engagement were associated with a host of positive outcomes for individuals and their employers.Our study revealed the value of engagement, but we wanted to know more about how engagement levels vary across different sectors and contexts.Sandeep's work formed part of the next steps in developing this further research process.The Consortium is now moving ahead with sharing knowledge and developing new insights into the nature of employee engagement and its impact on organisations.Five key areas are being explored: What does 'employee engagement' mean?; How can engagement be managed?;What are the consequences of engagement for organisations?; How does engagement relate to other individual characteristics?; How is engagement related to employee voice and representation?Sandeep's dissertation involved exploring some of the relevant literature around each of these issues.Specifically she focused on three key questions:1. How has employee engagement been conceptualised?2. How do individual differences relate to employee engagement? 3. How does employee involvement relate to employee engagement?This working paper summarises a broad range of academic literature under each of these headings.We found it a useful contribution to our subsequent work, and we are grateful to Sandeep for pursuing her dissertation research with such depth and rigour.I trust it will be of interest to anyone wishing to know more about this increasingly important area of management practice.

Key concepts: Employee engagement, Public relations, Business, Psychology, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Employee Engagement: A Literature Review — Research Paper | ScholarLens