2009•Unpublished venueRequires access

Closely related languages, different ways of realizing focus

Szu‐Wei Chen, Bei Wang, Yi Xu

Open publisher page 129 citations

Abstract

We investigated how focus was prosodically realized in Taiwanese, Taiwan Mandarin and Beijing Mandarin by monolingual and bilingual speakers. Acoustic analyses showed that all speakers raised pitch and intensity of focused words, but only Beijing Mandarin speakers lowered pitch and intensity of post-focus words. Cross-group differences in duration were mixed. When listening to stimuli from their own language groups, subjects from Beijing had over 80 % focus recognition rate, while those from Taiwan had less than 70% recognition rate. This difference is mainly due to presence/absence of post-focus compression. These findings have implications for prosodic typology, language contact and bilingualism. Index Terms: focus, language contact, bilingualism 1.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We investigated how focus was prosodically realized in Taiwanese, Taiwan Mandarin and Beijing Mandarin by monolingual and bilingual speakers. Acoustic analyses showed that all speakers raised pitch and intensity of focused words, but only Beijing Mandarin speakers lowered pitch and intensity of post-focus words. Cross-group differences in duration were mixed. When listening to stimuli from their own language groups, subjects from Beijing had over 80 % focus recognition rate, while those from Taiwan had less than 70% recognition rate. This difference is mainly due to presence/absence of post-focus compression. These findings have implications for prosodic typology, language contact and bilingualism. Index Terms: focus, language contact, bilingualism 1.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 129 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We investigated how focus was prosodically realized in Taiwanese, Taiwan Mandarin and Beijing Mandarin by monolingual and bilingual speakers. Acoustic analyses showed that all speakers raised pitch and intensity of focused words, but only Beijing Mandarin speakers lowered pitch and intensity of post-focus words. Cross-group differences in duration were mixed. When listening to stimuli from their own language groups, subjects from Beijing had over 80 % focus recognition rate, while those from Taiwan had less than 70% recognition rate. This difference is mainly due to presence/absence of post-focus compression. These findings have implications for prosodic typology, language contact and bilingualism. Index Terms: focus, language contact, bilingualism 1.

Key concepts: Mandarin Chinese, Focus (optics), Beijing, Active listening, Psychology, Linguistics, Duration (music), Speech recognition

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Closely related languages, different ways of realizing focus — Research Paper | ScholarLens