1999Unpublished venueRequires access

Analysis of shielded tents and other electrically thin shielded rooms

L.O. Hoeft, C.M. Wiggins

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

An analysis of a large shielded tent or enclosure with electrically thin walls showed that three frequency ranges were important. At low frequencies, the shielding effectiveness for a single shield increases at the rate of 20 dB/decade and depends on the surface resistivity and enclosure size. At mid frequencies, the shielding effectiveness is frequency independent and depends on the surface resistivity. At high frequencies, the standing waves inside the enclosure become apparent and the shielding effectiveness depends on the absorption in the enclosure and the apertures in the walls. With metallized fabric presently available, the effectiveness of a single shield on a large facility can be in the range of 60 to 85 dB for frequencies above a few hundred kHz. A shielded floor is essential if significant shielding was required.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An analysis of a large shielded tent or enclosure with electrically thin walls showed that three frequency ranges were important. At low frequencies, the shielding effectiveness for a single shield increases at the rate of 20 dB/decade and depends on the surface resistivity and enclosure size. At mid frequencies, the shielding effectiveness is frequency independent and depends on the surface resistivity. At high frequencies, the standing waves inside the enclosure become apparent and the shielding effectiveness depends on the absorption in the enclosure and the apertures in the walls. With metallized fabric presently available, the effectiveness of a single shield on a large facility can be in the range of 60 to 85 dB for frequencies above a few hundred kHz. A shielded floor is essential if significant shielding was required.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

An analysis of a large shielded tent or enclosure with electrically thin walls showed that three frequency ranges were important. At low frequencies, the shielding effectiveness for a single shield increases at the rate of 20 dB/decade and depends on the surface resistivity and enclosure size. At mid frequencies, the shielding effectiveness is frequency independent and depends on the surface resistivity. At high frequencies, the standing waves inside the enclosure become apparent and the shielding effectiveness depends on the absorption in the enclosure and the apertures in the walls. With metallized fabric presently available, the effectiveness of a single shield on a large facility can be in the range of 60 to 85 dB for frequencies above a few hundred kHz. A shielded floor is essential if significant shielding was required.

Key concepts: Shielded cable, Electromagnetic shielding, Enclosure, Shield, Materials science, Shielding effect, Acoustics, Electrical engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analysis of shielded tents and other electrically thin shielded rooms — Research Paper | ScholarLens