Compensating for shielded enclosure effects on radiated emissions measurements
Robert B. Smith
Abstract
Robert B. Smith
Abstract
This paper compares the differences in open area test site (OATS) derived antenna factors to those derived for a specific location of a shielded enclosure as well as the resultant E-field of a simulated-equipment under test (S-EUT) using each. It will also show that using position specific shielded enclosure derived antenna factors not only produces excellent agreement on the resultant E-field for measurements made in two enclosures, but also to the predicted E-field of the S-EUT.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper compares the differences in open area test site (OATS) derived antenna factors to those derived for a specific location of a shielded enclosure as well as the resultant E-field of a simulated-equipment under test (S-EUT) using each. It will also show that using position specific shielded enclosure derived antenna factors not only produces excellent agreement on the resultant E-field for measurements made in two enclosures, but also to the predicted E-field of the S-EUT.
Key concepts: Shielded cable, Enclosure, Acoustics, Antenna (radio), Environmental science, Position (finance), Electrical engineering, Engineering