Mencius and Xunzi on human nature : The concept of moral autonomy in the early confucian tradition
Maurizio Scarpari
Abstract
Maurizio Scarpari
Abstract
The doctrines on the goodness or evilness of human nature maintained in ancient China respectively by Me,ncius (390-305 BC) and Xunzi (310-219 BC) has been interpreted mostly as a contradiction within the Confucian school. In this article it is argued that they represent two distinct, yet possible and congruous, modes of interpreting and re-elaborating Confucius' teachings, two opposing yet largely complementary currents which have developed within the confucian school
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The doctrines on the goodness or evilness of human nature maintained in ancient China respectively by Me,ncius (390-305 BC) and Xunzi (310-219 BC) has been interpreted mostly as a contradiction within the Confucian school. In this article it is argued that they represent two distinct, yet possible and congruous, modes of interpreting and re-elaborating Confucius' teachings, two opposing yet largely complementary currents which have developed within the confucian school
Key concepts: Contradiction, Autonomy, Philosophy, China, Epistemology, Environmental ethics, Sociology, Law