2013Unpublished venueRequires access

Special Operations, Irregular Warfare, and Operational Art: A Theory of Special Operations

Jr Harris, D. William

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract : Despite the rapid expansion of special operations forces around the world, their strategic utility rests on obscure foundations. Building on the insights of the literature on special operations it is possible to construct a theory of special operations that explains the nature of special operations forces and the conditions that favor the successful pursuit of strategic purpose through special operations tactical actions. The theory predicts that states will increasingly create special operations forces to combat irregular threats because irregular warfare is evolving into a functionally separate domain of war. Defining Irregular warfare as war fought by institutionally weak combatants, as opposed to conventional warfare between institutionally strong states, provides a useful theoretical basis for understanding the nature and history of irregular warfare. The increase in cross-border linkages and inexpensive weaponry have propelled an historic expansion of irregular warfare to the point where it is a functionally separate domain of war, dominated by its own grammar connecting tactical actions to strategic purpose. Designing operations to contest this irregular domain requires an understanding of the nature of irregular warfare. Five fundamental characteristics of irregular warfare guide the operational design of special operations: inability to project power over distance, the prevalence of short-term offensive actions, the proximity of the tactical and strategic levels, violent competitive coalition building, and mismatches between limited and total war. These characteristics define an opaque form of warfare, requiring physical, cognitive, and moral access to successfully pursue strategic purpose. These three types of access summarize nine tenets of special operations operational art, which the theory derived from an understanding of the fundamental nature of irregular as a guide for the design of special operations campaigns. Arranging tactical actions to achieve

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract : Despite the rapid expansion of special operations forces around the world, their strategic utility rests on obscure foundations. Building on the insights of the literature on special operations it is possible to construct a theory of special operations that explains the nature of special operations forces and the conditions that favor the successful pursuit of strategic purpose through special operations tactical actions. The theory predicts that states will increasingly create special operations forces to combat irregular threats because irregular warfare is evolving into a functionally separate domain of war. Defining Irregular warfare as war fought by institutionally weak combatants, as opposed to conventional warfare between institutionally strong states, provides a useful theoretical basis for understanding the nature and history of irregular warfare. The increase in cross-border linkages and inexpensive weaponry have propelled an historic expansion of irregular warfare to the point where it is a functionally separate domain of war, dominated by its own grammar connecting tactical actions to strategic purpose. Designing operations to contest this irregular domain requires an understanding of the nature of irregular warfare. Five fundamental characteristics of irregular warfare guide the operational design of special operations: inability to project power over distance, the prevalence of short-term offensive actions, the proximity of the tactical and strategic levels, violent competitive coalition building, and mismatches between limited and total war. These characteristics define an opaque form of warfare, requiring physical, cognitive, and moral access to successfully pursue strategic purpose. These three types of access summarize nine tenets of special operations operational art, which the theory derived from an understanding of the fundamental nature of irregular as a guide for the design of special operations campaigns. Arranging tactical actions to achieve

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract : Despite the rapid expansion of special operations forces around the world, their strategic utility rests on obscure foundations. Building on the insights of the literature on special operations it is possible to construct a theory of special operations that explains the nature of special operations forces and the conditions that favor the successful pursuit of strategic purpose through special operations tactical actions. The theory predicts that states will increasingly create special operations forces to combat irregular threats because irregular warfare is evolving into a functionally separate domain of war. Defining Irregular warfare as war fought by institutionally weak combatants, as opposed to conventional warfare between institutionally strong states, provides a useful theoretical basis for understanding the nature and history of irregular warfare. The increase in cross-border linkages and inexpensive weaponry have propelled an historic expansion of irregular warfare to the point where it is a functionally separate domain of war, dominated by its own grammar connecting tactical actions to strategic purpose. Designing operations to contest this irregular domain requires an understanding of the nature of irregular warfare. Five fundamental characteristics of irregular warfare guide the operational design of special operations: inability to project power over distance, the prevalence of short-term offensive actions, the proximity of the tactical and strategic levels, violent competitive coalition building, and mismatches between limited and total war. These characteristics define an opaque form of warfare, requiring physical, cognitive, and moral access to successfully pursue strategic purpose. These three types of access summarize nine tenets of special operations operational art, which the theory derived from an understanding of the fundamental nature of irregular as a guide for the design of special operations campaigns. Arranging tactical actions to achieve

Key concepts: Computer science, Operations research, Operational level of war, Special forces, Computer security, Aeronautics, Engineering, History

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Special Operations, Irregular Warfare, and Operational Art: A Theory of Special Operations — Research Paper | ScholarLens