1996Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)Requires access

Clausewitz Theory on War and Its Applicability Today

Larry New

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The renowned theorist of war, Carl von Clausewitz, stated that a certain grasp of military affairs is vital for those in charge of general policy. Recognizing the reality that government leaders are not military experts, he went on to say "the only sound expedient is to make the commander-in-chief a member of the cabinet." Many governments are so organized, including the United States, whose Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is, by law, the top military advisor to the President. The U.S. record of military success in this century indicates that Clausewitz was right. The stronger the relationship between the nation's senior military commanders and the government, the more effective the nation is at using the military instrument of foreign policy to achieve national political objectives. The strength of that relationship depends on the Commander's ability to communicate and the statesmen's ability to grasp the inherent linkage between the nature of war, the purpose of war, and the conduct of war. Clausewitz called this linkage a paradoxical trinity with three aspects: the people, the commander and his army, and the government. The people have to do with the nature of war, the military with the conduct of war, and the government with the purpose of war. This paper addresses how Clausewitzian theory applies to America's recent history, and how the theory that holds true may be applied to future situations in which the military instrument is considered or used in foreign policy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The renowned theorist of war, Carl von Clausewitz, stated that a certain grasp of military affairs is vital for those in charge of general policy. Recognizing the reality that government leaders are not military experts, he went on to say "the only sound expedient is to make the commander-in-chief a member of the cabinet." Many governments are so organized, including the United States, whose Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is, by law, the top military advisor to the President. The U.S. record of military success in this century indicates that Clausewitz was right. The stronger the relationship between the nation's senior military commanders and the government, the more effective the nation is at using the military instrument of foreign policy to achieve national political objectives. The strength of that relationship depends on the Commander's ability to communicate and the statesmen's ability to grasp the inherent linkage between the nature of war, the purpose of war, and the conduct of war. Clausewitz called this linkage a paradoxical trinity with three aspects: the people, the commander and his army, and the government. The people have to do with the nature of war, the military with the conduct of war, and the government with the purpose of war. This paper addresses how Clausewitzian theory applies to America's recent history, and how the theory that holds true may be applied to future situations in which the military instrument is considered or used in foreign policy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The renowned theorist of war, Carl von Clausewitz, stated that a certain grasp of military affairs is vital for those in charge of general policy. Recognizing the reality that government leaders are not military experts, he went on to say "the only sound expedient is to make the commander-in-chief a member of the cabinet." Many governments are so organized, including the United States, whose Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is, by law, the top military advisor to the President. The U.S. record of military success in this century indicates that Clausewitz was right. The stronger the relationship between the nation's senior military commanders and the government, the more effective the nation is at using the military instrument of foreign policy to achieve national political objectives. The strength of that relationship depends on the Commander's ability to communicate and the statesmen's ability to grasp the inherent linkage between the nature of war, the purpose of war, and the conduct of war. Clausewitz called this linkage a paradoxical trinity with three aspects: the people, the commander and his army, and the government. The people have to do with the nature of war, the military with the conduct of war, and the government with the purpose of war. This paper addresses how Clausewitzian theory applies to America's recent history, and how the theory that holds true may be applied to future situations in which the military instrument is considered or used in foreign policy.

Key concepts: Military science, Military theory, Cabinet (room), Foreign policy, Revolution in Military Affairs, Military operations other than war, Military sociology, Operational level of war

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clausewitz Theory on War and Its Applicability Today — Research Paper | ScholarLens