2008bepress Legal RepositoryOpen access

One Law to Control Them All: International Merger Analysis in the Wake of GE/Honeywell

Kyle M Robertson

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

The proposed merger of General Electric and Honeywell International, two U.S. owned and operated companies, was blocked on an international level by the European Commission even after its domestic approval. Despite the closeness of U.S. and EU antitrust laws, regulators in both countries reached opposite conclusions regarding the effects of the merger. This case highlights the complexities of international merger analysis in the absence of a global competition policy and the dangers that inherently exist in the current regulatory landscape. This has made it clear that countries with restrictive merger guidelines can become the gatekeepers for large scale international mergers. Specifically, China has recently enacted antitrust legislation that may grant them the power of ultimate decision in mergers that cross their boundaries, even if Chinese involvement is only a small component of the overall merger.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The proposed merger of General Electric and Honeywell International, two U.S. owned and operated companies, was blocked on an international level by the European Commission even after its domestic approval. Despite the closeness of U.S. and EU antitrust laws, regulators in both countries reached opposite conclusions regarding the effects of the merger. This case highlights the complexities of international merger analysis in the absence of a global competition policy and the dangers that inherently exist in the current regulatory landscape. This has made it clear that countries with restrictive merger guidelines can become the gatekeepers for large scale international mergers. Specifically, China has recently enacted antitrust legislation that may grant them the power of ultimate decision in mergers that cross their boundaries, even if Chinese involvement is only a small component of the overall merger.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The proposed merger of General Electric and Honeywell International, two U.S. owned and operated companies, was blocked on an international level by the European Commission even after its domestic approval. Despite the closeness of U.S. and EU antitrust laws, regulators in both countries reached opposite conclusions regarding the effects of the merger. This case highlights the complexities of international merger analysis in the absence of a global competition policy and the dangers that inherently exist in the current regulatory landscape. This has made it clear that countries with restrictive merger guidelines can become the gatekeepers for large scale international mergers. Specifically, China has recently enacted antitrust legislation that may grant them the power of ultimate decision in mergers that cross their boundaries, even if Chinese involvement is only a small component of the overall merger.

Key concepts: Merger control, China, International trade, Legislation, Commission, European commission, Business, Competition (biology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
One Law to Control Them All: International Merger Analysis in the Wake of GE/Honeywell — Research Paper | ScholarLens