2006Proceedings of the International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury conferenceRequires access

Comparison of Biofidelic Responses to Rear Impact of the Head/Neck/Torso among Human Volunteers, PMHS, and Dummies

Masayuki Yaguchi, Koshiro Ono, Masami Kubota, Fumio Matsuoka

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Several methods of rear impact test to reduce neck injuries in rear-end real world collisions have been suggested so far. One typical test method is a dynamic test similar to actual low-speed rear impacts. This study aims to evaluate the biofidelity of BioRID-II, RID 2, Hybrid-III, Thor-NT, and Thor-FT dummies on the basis of the responses of head/neck/torso in order to identify the most suitable dummy for the dynamic test simulating low-speed rear impacts. Currently Hybrid-III developed for high-speed frontal impacts is a candidate for the low-speed rear impact test. Also, Thor-NT and Thor-FT are the next generation frontal impact dummies. Therefore, the evaluation on the potentials of Thor-NT and Thor-FT as dummies for low-speed rear impact tests is also included. Two series of tests were conducted in order to evaluate the biofidelity of the dummies. One, a Mini- Sled Test simulating low-speed rear impacts, was conducted at a low acceleration level with an impact velocity of 8 km/h in order to avoid the risk of injury to human volunteers. The other was a Back Impact Test to identify dummy responses at higher impact level than that of the Mini-Sled Test. If dummy characteristics differ, it is likely that even if tests are carried out under the same conditions, the impact responses would vary and the evaluation results would differ. Therefore, a HYGE Sled Test was conducted in order to clarify the response differences of the five types of dummies in the dynamic test that was proposed to evaluate car seats. From the test results, the response differences of the five types of dummies were clearly observed. As for the low-speed rear impact, the responses of BioRID-II were the most similar to those of both human volunteers and PMHS (Post Mortem Human Subjects). Biofidelity of RID 2 was not so good compared to BioRID-II. On the other hand, biofidelity of Hybrid-III was relatively poor and biofidelity of the two Thor dummies were almost the same as that of the Hybrid-III. It is concluded that among the five dummies, BioRID-II is the most suitable for the evaluation of low-speed rear impacts. For the covering abstract see ITRD E141569.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Several methods of rear impact test to reduce neck injuries in rear-end real world collisions have been suggested so far. One typical test method is a dynamic test similar to actual low-speed rear impacts. This study aims to evaluate the biofidelity of BioRID-II, RID 2, Hybrid-III, Thor-NT, and Thor-FT dummies on the basis of the responses of head/neck/torso in order to identify the most suitable dummy for the dynamic test simulating low-speed rear impacts. Currently Hybrid-III developed for high-speed frontal impacts is a candidate for the low-speed rear impact test. Also, Thor-NT and Thor-FT are the next generation frontal impact dummies. Therefore, the evaluation on the potentials of Thor-NT and Thor-FT as dummies for low-speed rear impact tests is also included. Two series of tests were conducted in order to evaluate the biofidelity of the dummies. One, a Mini- Sled Test simulating low-speed rear impacts, was conducted at a low acceleration level with an impact velocity of 8 km/h in order to avoid the risk of injury to human volunteers. The other was a Back Impact Test to identify dummy responses at higher impact level than that of the Mini-Sled Test. If dummy characteristics differ, it is likely that even if tests are carried out under the same conditions, the impact responses would vary and the evaluation results would differ. Therefore, a HYGE Sled Test was conducted in order to clarify the response differences of the five types of dummies in the dynamic test that was proposed to evaluate car seats. From the test results, the response differences of the five types of dummies were clearly observed. As for the low-speed rear impact, the responses of BioRID-II were the most similar to those of both human volunteers and PMHS (Post Mortem Human Subjects). Biofidelity of RID 2 was not so good compared to BioRID-II. On the other hand, biofidelity of Hybrid-III was relatively poor and biofidelity of the two Thor dummies were almost the same as that of the Hybrid-III. It is concluded that among the five dummies, BioRID-II is the most suitable for the evaluation of low-speed rear impacts. For the covering abstract see ITRD E141569.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Several methods of rear impact test to reduce neck injuries in rear-end real world collisions have been suggested so far. One typical test method is a dynamic test similar to actual low-speed rear impacts. This study aims to evaluate the biofidelity of BioRID-II, RID 2, Hybrid-III, Thor-NT, and Thor-FT dummies on the basis of the responses of head/neck/torso in order to identify the most suitable dummy for the dynamic test simulating low-speed rear impacts. Currently Hybrid-III developed for high-speed frontal impacts is a candidate for the low-speed rear impact test. Also, Thor-NT and Thor-FT are the next generation frontal impact dummies. Therefore, the evaluation on the potentials of Thor-NT and Thor-FT as dummies for low-speed rear impact tests is also included. Two series of tests were conducted in order to evaluate the biofidelity of the dummies. One, a Mini- Sled Test simulating low-speed rear impacts, was conducted at a low acceleration level with an impact velocity of 8 km/h in order to avoid the risk of injury to human volunteers. The other was a Back Impact Test to identify dummy responses at higher impact level than that of the Mini-Sled Test. If dummy characteristics differ, it is likely that even if tests are carried out under the same conditions, the impact responses would vary and the evaluation results would differ. Therefore, a HYGE Sled Test was conducted in order to clarify the response differences of the five types of dummies in the dynamic test that was proposed to evaluate car seats. From the test results, the response differences of the five types of dummies were clearly observed. As for the low-speed rear impact, the responses of BioRID-II were the most similar to those of both human volunteers and PMHS (Post Mortem Human Subjects). Biofidelity of RID 2 was not so good compared to BioRID-II. On the other hand, biofidelity of Hybrid-III was relatively poor and biofidelity of the two Thor dummies were almost the same as that of the Hybrid-III. It is concluded that among the five dummies, BioRID-II is the most suitable for the evaluation of low-speed rear impacts. For the covering abstract see ITRD E141569.

Key concepts: Torso, Hybrid III, Neck injury, Simulation, Test (biology), Acceleration, Poison control, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Biofidelic Responses to Rear Impact of the Head/Neck/Torso among Human Volunteers, PMHS, and Dummies — Research Paper | ScholarLens