Inequity Aversion, Overconfidence, and Group Performance
Nannan Zhou
Abstract
Open-access reader
Nannan Zhou
Abstract
Open-access reader
This thesis theoretically investigates the impact of inequity aversion and overconfidence on group performance. The studies presented concentrate on two main topics: First, we investigate the private provision of public goods when agents are motivated by fairness concerns in terms of inequity aversion. Second, we study the consequences of overly optimistic self-perception for the allocation of tasks and the incentives for cooperation in teams. All studies are common regarding three features: First, they all focus on situations in which economically efficient effort choices and contribution levels are not contracted such that incentives for free-riding behavior may exist. Second, both in the public goods and in the team production settings the group outcome is always fully and equally shared by all group members. Finally, both inequity aversion and overconfidence can help to mitigate the negative impact of the free-rider problem leading to more efficient outcomes, even without having to implement the optimal incentive contracts.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This thesis theoretically investigates the impact of inequity aversion and overconfidence on group performance. The studies presented concentrate on two main topics: First, we investigate the private provision of public goods when agents are motivated by fairness concerns in terms of inequity aversion. Second, we study the consequences of overly optimistic self-perception for the allocation of tasks and the incentives for cooperation in teams. All studies are common regarding three features: First, they all focus on situations in which economically efficient effort choices and contribution levels are not contracted such that incentives for free-riding behavior may exist. Second, both in the public goods and in the team production settings the group outcome is always fully and equally shared by all group members. Finally, both inequity aversion and overconfidence can help to mitigate the negative impact of the free-rider problem leading to more efficient outcomes, even without having to implement the optimal incentive contracts.
Key concepts: Inequity aversion, Overconfidence effect, Incentive, Public good, Microeconomics, Free rider problem, Economics, Perception