2008Scandinavian Journal of EconomicsRequires access

Inequity Aversion and Team Incentives

Pedro Rey‐Biel

Open publisher page 157 citations

Abstract

Abstract We study optimal contracts in a simple model where employees are averse to inequity, as modeled by Fehr and Schmidt (1999) . A “selfish” employer can profitably exploitenvyorguiltby offering contracts which create inequity off‐equilibrium, i.e., when employees do not meet his demands. Such contracts resembleteamandrelative performancecontracts. We derive conditions for inequity aversion to be in itself a reason to form work teams of distributionally concerned employees, even in situations in which effort is contractible.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract We study optimal contracts in a simple model where employees are averse to inequity, as modeled by Fehr and Schmidt (1999) . A “selfish” employer can profitably exploitenvyorguiltby offering contracts which create inequity off‐equilibrium, i.e., when employees do not meet his demands. Such contracts resembleteamandrelative performancecontracts. We derive conditions for inequity aversion to be in itself a reason to form work teams of distributionally concerned employees, even in situations in which effort is contractible.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 157 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract We study optimal contracts in a simple model where employees are averse to inequity, as modeled by Fehr and Schmidt (1999) . A “selfish” employer can profitably exploitenvyorguiltby offering contracts which create inequity off‐equilibrium, i.e., when employees do not meet his demands. Such contracts resembleteamandrelative performancecontracts. We derive conditions for inequity aversion to be in itself a reason to form work teams of distributionally concerned employees, even in situations in which effort is contractible.

Key concepts: Inequity aversion, Incentive, Economics, Exploit, Microeconomics, Work (physics), Incomplete contracts, Loss aversion

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Inequity Aversion and Team Incentives — Research Paper | ScholarLens