2009Unpublished venueRequires access

Design: The Future of Planning?

Michael F Minaudo

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract : The complexity of warfare in the 21st century has significantly evolved. The wicked problems that military planners face has forced the military to reexamine the practices that are used in developing solutions to these challenges. Army Field Manual (I) 5-2, Design, dated 20 February 2009 was developed to assist military planners in these endeavors. According to the Manual,design is an approach to critical and creative thinking that enables a commander to create understanding about a unique situation and on that basis, to visualize and describe how to generate change. This paper explores the following questions: (1) Is Army Field Manual (I) 5-2, Design, consistent with joint operational art in the U.S. military?; and (2) Should design be incorporated into U.S. joint military doctrine to offer Commanders an additional planning tool that can be complimentary to the current Joint Operations Planning Process (JOPP)? The paper supports the conclusion that design should be incorporated into U.S. joint military doctrine to give Commanders another tool for accomplishing complex missions. Other recommendations for further research and analysis concerning the utility, implementation, and applicability of design in operational art are shared.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract : The complexity of warfare in the 21st century has significantly evolved. The wicked problems that military planners face has forced the military to reexamine the practices that are used in developing solutions to these challenges. Army Field Manual (I) 5-2, Design, dated 20 February 2009 was developed to assist military planners in these endeavors. According to the Manual,design is an approach to critical and creative thinking that enables a commander to create understanding about a unique situation and on that basis, to visualize and describe how to generate change. This paper explores the following questions: (1) Is Army Field Manual (I) 5-2, Design, consistent with joint operational art in the U.S. military?; and (2) Should design be incorporated into U.S. joint military doctrine to offer Commanders an additional planning tool that can be complimentary to the current Joint Operations Planning Process (JOPP)? The paper supports the conclusion that design should be incorporated into U.S. joint military doctrine to give Commanders another tool for accomplishing complex missions. Other recommendations for further research and analysis concerning the utility, implementation, and applicability of design in operational art are shared.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract : The complexity of warfare in the 21st century has significantly evolved. The wicked problems that military planners face has forced the military to reexamine the practices that are used in developing solutions to these challenges. Army Field Manual (I) 5-2, Design, dated 20 February 2009 was developed to assist military planners in these endeavors. According to the Manual,design is an approach to critical and creative thinking that enables a commander to create understanding about a unique situation and on that basis, to visualize and describe how to generate change. This paper explores the following questions: (1) Is Army Field Manual (I) 5-2, Design, consistent with joint operational art in the U.S. military?; and (2) Should design be incorporated into U.S. joint military doctrine to offer Commanders an additional planning tool that can be complimentary to the current Joint Operations Planning Process (JOPP)? The paper supports the conclusion that design should be incorporated into U.S. joint military doctrine to give Commanders another tool for accomplishing complex missions. Other recommendations for further research and analysis concerning the utility, implementation, and applicability of design in operational art are shared.

Key concepts: Doctrine, Military doctrine, Joint (building), Operational level of war, Field (mathematics), Process (computing), Operations research, Military strategy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Design: The Future of Planning? — Research Paper | ScholarLens