Joint Warfighting in the Twenty-First Century
Richard Hart Sinnreich, Williamson Murray
Abstract
Richard Hart Sinnreich, Williamson Murray
Abstract
To avoid surprise on the battlefield, the US military's approach to war in the twenty-first century must reconcile what is changing with what endures in war. A commander must be able to diagnose the alternatives open to him, recognize the strategic and operational implications of adopting one or some combination, and apply available resources most effectively to the methods selected. The authors examined past military transformations in three areas: professional military education, logistics, and command and control. The results were a framework and principles that can guide the development of joint operational concepts. A joint operational concept should meet the criteria of (1) providing guidelines to design operational campaigns in a variety of situations; (2) enabling exploration of alternative capabilities introduced over time; and (3) informing experimentation campaigns and investment decisions. Using a joint operational concept as a tool for force development will not constrain armed forces rigidly to a single method to the exclusion of all others.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
To avoid surprise on the battlefield, the US military's approach to war in the twenty-first century must reconcile what is changing with what endures in war. A commander must be able to diagnose the alternatives open to him, recognize the strategic and operational implications of adopting one or some combination, and apply available resources most effectively to the methods selected. The authors examined past military transformations in three areas: professional military education, logistics, and command and control. The results were a framework and principles that can guide the development of joint operational concepts. A joint operational concept should meet the criteria of (1) providing guidelines to design operational campaigns in a variety of situations; (2) enabling exploration of alternative capabilities introduced over time; and (3) informing experimentation campaigns and investment decisions. Using a joint operational concept as a tool for force development will not constrain armed forces rigidly to a single method to the exclusion of all others.
Key concepts: Joint (building), Computer science, Aeronautics, History, Engineering, Architectural engineering