2001Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Is our current energy path sustainable?

Mark Jaccard

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The art and science of energy system forecasting T o determine if our energy system is sustainable, we need to estimate where it is headed. Although the system currently works – which some might debate – this is no guarantee that it is not on the verge of exhaustion of a critical input or a catastrophic environmental collapse. To decide how, if at all, we should act upon our energy system today, we must decide if we are happy with where it is headed over the longer term. This means that we have to forecast the energy system's likely evolution in the absence of efforts to change course. However, as one wag said, “forecasting is difficult – especially into the future.” Indeed, exercises in forecasting and prediction are now recognized as so imbued with uncertainty and with the biases of forecasters that it has become fashionable for some energy analysts to pronounce their opposition to forecasting altogether. Certainly, it is true that hindsight analysis in recent years has revealed the abysmal predictive record of most energy forecasting exercises. But does this mean that we should just throw up our hands and avoid forecasting? Unfortunately, avoidance is not an option. Politicians, businesses and individuals are always making decisions that shape our future and these decisions are made with some implicit notion of how the world is likely to unfold. That implicit notion is a forecast. In the same vein, policy makers cannot abstain from making policy in areas where they have responsibility.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The art and science of energy system forecasting T o determine if our energy system is sustainable, we need to estimate where it is headed. Although the system currently works – which some might debate – this is no guarantee that it is not on the verge of exhaustion of a critical input or a catastrophic environmental collapse. To decide how, if at all, we should act upon our energy system today, we must decide if we are happy with where it is headed over the longer term. This means that we have to forecast the energy system's likely evolution in the absence of efforts to change course. However, as one wag said, “forecasting is difficult – especially into the future.” Indeed, exercises in forecasting and prediction are now recognized as so imbued with uncertainty and with the biases of forecasters that it has become fashionable for some energy analysts to pronounce their opposition to forecasting altogether. Certainly, it is true that hindsight analysis in recent years has revealed the abysmal predictive record of most energy forecasting exercises. But does this mean that we should just throw up our hands and avoid forecasting? Unfortunately, avoidance is not an option. Politicians, businesses and individuals are always making decisions that shape our future and these decisions are made with some implicit notion of how the world is likely to unfold. That implicit notion is a forecast. In the same vein, policy makers cannot abstain from making policy in areas where they have responsibility.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The art and science of energy system forecasting T o determine if our energy system is sustainable, we need to estimate where it is headed. Although the system currently works – which some might debate – this is no guarantee that it is not on the verge of exhaustion of a critical input or a catastrophic environmental collapse. To decide how, if at all, we should act upon our energy system today, we must decide if we are happy with where it is headed over the longer term. This means that we have to forecast the energy system's likely evolution in the absence of efforts to change course. However, as one wag said, “forecasting is difficult – especially into the future.” Indeed, exercises in forecasting and prediction are now recognized as so imbued with uncertainty and with the biases of forecasters that it has become fashionable for some energy analysts to pronounce their opposition to forecasting altogether. Certainly, it is true that hindsight analysis in recent years has revealed the abysmal predictive record of most energy forecasting exercises. But does this mean that we should just throw up our hands and avoid forecasting? Unfortunately, avoidance is not an option. Politicians, businesses and individuals are always making decisions that shape our future and these decisions are made with some implicit notion of how the world is likely to unfold. That implicit notion is a forecast. In the same vein, policy makers cannot abstain from making policy in areas where they have responsibility.

Key concepts: Energy system, Energy (signal processing), Sustainable energy, Path (computing), Term (time), Natural resource economics, Environmental economics, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Is our current energy path sustainable? — Research Paper | ScholarLens