1976Mathematics Teacher Learning and Teaching PK-12Requires access

NACOME: Implications for Curriculum Design

Morris Kline

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

The authors of the Nacome report are to be thanked for undertaking a massive task and congratulated for having done a comprehensive, conscientious, and fair survey of the recent educational movements in school mathematics. Though it does seem inclined toward defending the new math, the report has tried to do so with arguments that, if not acceptable to all, have some force and that perhaps, in a field such as education ahout which we all know so little, may be faultless. Moreover, it does not balk at leveling criticisms where it feels justified in doing so. The report not only describes what has happened but indicates the problems ahead now that we realize the promised millenium has not arrived. Its objectivity is in marked contrast to many of the one-sided reports that appeared in the 1960s.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The authors of the Nacome report are to be thanked for undertaking a massive task and congratulated for having done a comprehensive, conscientious, and fair survey of the recent educational movements in school mathematics. Though it does seem inclined toward defending the new math, the report has tried to do so with arguments that, if not acceptable to all, have some force and that perhaps, in a field such as education ahout which we all know so little, may be faultless. Moreover, it does not balk at leveling criticisms where it feels justified in doing so. The report not only describes what has happened but indicates the problems ahead now that we realize the promised millenium has not arrived. Its objectivity is in marked contrast to many of the one-sided reports that appeared in the 1960s.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The authors of the Nacome report are to be thanked for undertaking a massive task and congratulated for having done a comprehensive, conscientious, and fair survey of the recent educational movements in school mathematics. Though it does seem inclined toward defending the new math, the report has tried to do so with arguments that, if not acceptable to all, have some force and that perhaps, in a field such as education ahout which we all know so little, may be faultless. Moreover, it does not balk at leveling criticisms where it feels justified in doing so. The report not only describes what has happened but indicates the problems ahead now that we realize the promised millenium has not arrived. Its objectivity is in marked contrast to many of the one-sided reports that appeared in the 1960s.

Key concepts: Objectivity (philosophy), Curriculum, Task force, Task (project management), Contrast (vision), Mathematics education, Political science, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
NACOME: Implications for Curriculum Design — Research Paper | ScholarLens