NACOME: Implications for Curriculum Design
Morris Kline
Abstract
Morris Kline
Abstract
The authors of the Nacome report are to be thanked for undertaking a massive task and congratulated for having done a comprehensive, conscientious, and fair survey of the recent educational movements in school mathematics. Though it does seem inclined toward defending the new math, the report has tried to do so with arguments that, if not acceptable to all, have some force and that perhaps, in a field such as education ahout which we all know so little, may be faultless. Moreover, it does not balk at leveling criticisms where it feels justified in doing so. The report not only describes what has happened but indicates the problems ahead now that we realize the promised millenium has not arrived. Its objectivity is in marked contrast to many of the one-sided reports that appeared in the 1960s.
OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The authors of the Nacome report are to be thanked for undertaking a massive task and congratulated for having done a comprehensive, conscientious, and fair survey of the recent educational movements in school mathematics. Though it does seem inclined toward defending the new math, the report has tried to do so with arguments that, if not acceptable to all, have some force and that perhaps, in a field such as education ahout which we all know so little, may be faultless. Moreover, it does not balk at leveling criticisms where it feels justified in doing so. The report not only describes what has happened but indicates the problems ahead now that we realize the promised millenium has not arrived. Its objectivity is in marked contrast to many of the one-sided reports that appeared in the 1960s.
Key concepts: Objectivity (philosophy), Curriculum, Task force, Task (project management), Contrast (vision), Mathematics education, Political science, Sociology