2004QUT Law ReviewOpen access

International Law and the Use of Force

Katie Peters

Open full text 102 citations

Abstract

The use of military force is only lawful if and to the extent that it comes under an accepted exception to the general rule of prohibition outlined in the Charter of the United Nations (‘UN Charter’).1 This paper examines whether, in the absence of any explicit authorisation from the United Nations Security Council (‘UNSC’), international law allows a state to use military force to compel another into meeting its obligations. In particular, it considers the extension of the traditional, customary law doctrine of self-defence to include pre-emptive and anticipatory attacks. It will be argued that although future extension of the doctrine is inevitable, any broadening of the relevant international law principles must be approached prudently and with the greatest respect for the traditional strict approach.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The use of military force is only lawful if and to the extent that it comes under an accepted exception to the general rule of prohibition outlined in the Charter of the United Nations (‘UN Charter’).1 This paper examines whether, in the absence of any explicit authorisation from the United Nations Security Council (‘UNSC’), international law allows a state to use military force to compel another into meeting its obligations. In particular, it considers the extension of the traditional, customary law doctrine of self-defence to include pre-emptive and anticipatory attacks. It will be argued that although future extension of the doctrine is inevitable, any broadening of the relevant international law principles must be approached prudently and with the greatest respect for the traditional strict approach.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 102 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The use of military force is only lawful if and to the extent that it comes under an accepted exception to the general rule of prohibition outlined in the Charter of the United Nations (‘UN Charter’).1 This paper examines whether, in the absence of any explicit authorisation from the United Nations Security Council (‘UNSC’), international law allows a state to use military force to compel another into meeting its obligations. In particular, it considers the extension of the traditional, customary law doctrine of self-defence to include pre-emptive and anticipatory attacks. It will be argued that although future extension of the doctrine is inevitable, any broadening of the relevant international law principles must be approached prudently and with the greatest respect for the traditional strict approach.

Key concepts: Law, Use of force, Political science, International law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
International Law and the Use of Force — Research Paper | ScholarLens