2020Edward Elgar Publishing eBooksRequires access

Terrorism and the international law on the use of force

Michael Wood

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The chapter addresses the use of force against terrorists abroad. The use of force against non-state actors may be authorized by the UN Security Council. More controversial is the use of force against terrorists in self-defence. Reliance is sometimes placed on the ‘unable and unwilling test’ and on ‘anticipatory self-defence’; neither is (yet) accepted by states generally. It is submitted that the existing rules of international law on the use of force are adequate (and anyway are not going to change anytime soon). What is needed is a greater degree of common understanding among states as to the application of the jus ad bellum in the face of modern terrorist threats.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The chapter addresses the use of force against terrorists abroad. The use of force against non-state actors may be authorized by the UN Security Council. More controversial is the use of force against terrorists in self-defence. Reliance is sometimes placed on the ‘unable and unwilling test’ and on ‘anticipatory self-defence’; neither is (yet) accepted by states generally. It is submitted that the existing rules of international law on the use of force are adequate (and anyway are not going to change anytime soon). What is needed is a greater degree of common understanding among states as to the application of the jus ad bellum in the face of modern terrorist threats.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The chapter addresses the use of force against terrorists abroad. The use of force against non-state actors may be authorized by the UN Security Council. More controversial is the use of force against terrorists in self-defence. Reliance is sometimes placed on the ‘unable and unwilling test’ and on ‘anticipatory self-defence’; neither is (yet) accepted by states generally. It is submitted that the existing rules of international law on the use of force are adequate (and anyway are not going to change anytime soon). What is needed is a greater degree of common understanding among states as to the application of the jus ad bellum in the face of modern terrorist threats.

Key concepts: Use of force, Jus ad bellum, Terrorism, Political science, Law, International law, State (computer science), Self defense

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Terrorism and the international law on the use of force — Research Paper | ScholarLens