2014•Spekali / სპეკალი (Ed Nana Gaprindashvili / სამეცნიერო რედაქტორი ნანა გაფრინდაშვილი)Requires access

The place of Word Formation in Georgian and German Linguistics based on the linguistic literature analyses

Ketevan Nikoladze

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In modern linguistic the concept “for formation” is used by two meanings. There exists a narrow understanding of this notion: “Word Formation is a formation of word on the basis of linguistic material and its help” [Fleischer ... 1995:5]. In this case it is understood, as a part of a scientific discipline – or grammar (morphology, syntax), which “studies the technique of word formation” [Tuskia, 2004:3]. Georgian Linguists, for example, A. Shanidze, L. Kvachadze unite word formation with general morphology, but the other ones, for example, Arn. Chikobava, V. Topuria, T. Zurabishvili, R. Gabechava and other perceive it as a part of Lexicology. The supporters of these views can be found among the foreign linguists as well, the ones who see word formation as a part of grammar are H. Pauli, B. Baumann, O. Behagel, I. Erben, K. Brickman and the ones who see word formation as a part of Lexicology are V. Schmidt, V. Moch, and other lexicologists. There exists, so to say, a transitional view, according to which word formation explores “Formation of new words, the rules by which they are being produced, and describes certain designs and models according to which they are being formed. Thus, this area stands between other disciplines, on the one hand, between syntax and, on the other hand, morphology and because word formation processes affect on the meaning of the word, it is also related to lexicology [Kuhn, 1994:2].

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In modern linguistic the concept “for formation” is used by two meanings. There exists a narrow understanding of this notion: “Word Formation is a formation of word on the basis of linguistic material and its help” [Fleischer ... 1995:5]. In this case it is understood, as a part of a scientific discipline – or grammar (morphology, syntax), which “studies the technique of word formation” [Tuskia, 2004:3]. Georgian Linguists, for example, A. Shanidze, L. Kvachadze unite word formation with general morphology, but the other ones, for example, Arn. Chikobava, V. Topuria, T. Zurabishvili, R. Gabechava and other perceive it as a part of Lexicology. The supporters of these views can be found among the foreign linguists as well, the ones who see word formation as a part of grammar are H. Pauli, B. Baumann, O. Behagel, I. Erben, K. Brickman and the ones who see word formation as a part of Lexicology are V. Schmidt, V. Moch, and other lexicologists. There exists, so to say, a transitional view, according to which word formation explores “Formation of new words, the rules by which they are being produced, and describes certain designs and models according to which they are being formed. Thus, this area stands between other disciplines, on the one hand, between syntax and, on the other hand, morphology and because word formation processes affect on the meaning of the word, it is also related to lexicology [Kuhn, 1994:2].

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In modern linguistic the concept “for formation” is used by two meanings. There exists a narrow understanding of this notion: “Word Formation is a formation of word on the basis of linguistic material and its help” [Fleischer ... 1995:5]. In this case it is understood, as a part of a scientific discipline – or grammar (morphology, syntax), which “studies the technique of word formation” [Tuskia, 2004:3]. Georgian Linguists, for example, A. Shanidze, L. Kvachadze unite word formation with general morphology, but the other ones, for example, Arn. Chikobava, V. Topuria, T. Zurabishvili, R. Gabechava and other perceive it as a part of Lexicology. The supporters of these views can be found among the foreign linguists as well, the ones who see word formation as a part of grammar are H. Pauli, B. Baumann, O. Behagel, I. Erben, K. Brickman and the ones who see word formation as a part of Lexicology are V. Schmidt, V. Moch, and other lexicologists. There exists, so to say, a transitional view, according to which word formation explores “Formation of new words, the rules by which they are being produced, and describes certain designs and models according to which they are being formed. Thus, this area stands between other disciplines, on the one hand, between syntax and, on the other hand, morphology and because word formation processes affect on the meaning of the word, it is also related to lexicology [Kuhn, 1994:2].

Key concepts: Word formation, Linguistics, Lexicology, Grammar, Syntax, Georgian, German, Word (group theory)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The place of Word Formation in Georgian and German Linguistics based on the linguistic literature analyses — Research Paper | ScholarLens