Field bioefficacy of flufenzin and fenpyroximate on red spider mite, Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Boisd) infesting brinjal*
R. L. Naik, G. R. Lolage, V. D. Kale, Dethe
Abstract
R. L. Naik, G. R. Lolage, V. D. Kale, Dethe
Abstract
Field-bioefficacy of flufenzin, fenpyroximate and dicofol @ 60,80,&100, 15,20,&25 and 250 g a.i./ha, respectively was evaluated against red spider mite (Tetranychus cinnabarinus) on brinjal. Fenpyroximate was more effective than flufenzin in protecting the crop against the mite. Relationship of profit margins-contributed by the acaricides suggested that all the three dosages of fenpyroximate and the higher dosage of flufenzin effectively controlled the mite and extended better monetary returns. None of the acaricides exhibited any phytotoxicity.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Field-bioefficacy of flufenzin, fenpyroximate and dicofol @ 60,80,&100, 15,20,&25 and 250 g a.i./ha, respectively was evaluated against red spider mite (Tetranychus cinnabarinus) on brinjal. Fenpyroximate was more effective than flufenzin in protecting the crop against the mite. Relationship of profit margins-contributed by the acaricides suggested that all the three dosages of fenpyroximate and the higher dosage of flufenzin effectively controlled the mite and extended better monetary returns. None of the acaricides exhibited any phytotoxicity.
Key concepts: Acaricide, Spider mite, Dicofol, Toxicology, Spider, Mite, Biology, Botany